The Journal to Eliza and Various letters by Laurence Sterne and Elizabeth Draper — John Shaqi
The Journal to Eliza and Various letters by Laurence Sterne and Elizabeth DraperSterne, Laurence
General
The Journal to Eliza and Various letters by Laurence Sterne and Elizabeth Draper
Sterne, Laurence
Draper, Elizabeth, 1744-1778; Novelists, English -- 18th century -- Correspondence; Sterne, Laurence, 1713-1768 -- Correspondence
It may be that Thackeray left the _Journal_ unread until after the
lecture on Sterne and Goldsmith. No positive statement can be made about
that. But it is not probable that he would fail to examine at once
Sterne manuscripts that he “gratefully” received. True, no quotation is
made from the _Journal_ for the lecture—and in that sense Thackeray
“made no use of it”—but a careless perusal of the document is precisely
what would lead one to the unreasonable view that Thackeray took of
Sterne. He was evidently much amused by the account Sterne gives of a
fever brought on by the loss of Eliza—the minute circumstances of the
blood letting and the wise physicians, the farewell to Eliza and the
announcement on an evening that “I am going,” to be corrected the next
morning by “So shall not depart as I apprehended.” At this point
Thackeray turned to that famous letter written on an afternoon at the
Mount Coffee-house to Lady P., which bears no date except “Tuesday, 3
o’clock,” though in the standard editions of Sterne it is among the
letters for April 1767. Sterne writes to “my dear lady” that if she will
permit him to spend the evening with her, he will gladly stay away from
Miss * * * * * * *’s benefit, for which he has purchased a box ticket.
On consulting the Dramatic Register, Thackeray discovered that the only
actresses to receive benefits on a Tuesday in April 1767 were Miss Pope
at Drury Lane and Miss Poitier at Covent Garden. The date for each was
the twenty-first. The very day then, that Sterne was dying for Eliza, he
was also dining in the Mount Coffee-house and trying to make an
assignation with Lady P. Cleverly forged as Thackeray’s chain may seem,
it has one weak link. The date of the letter to Lady P. is undetermined.
In Mrs. Medalle’s edition of the correspondence, the letter was placed
near the end as if it belonged to December 1767 or to January 1768. In
the collected edition of Sterne’s works, it first appeared with the
letters for April 1767. April 21, 1767 is impossible, for Sterne was
surely too ill then to leave his lodgings. On that very day, as
Thackeray might have observed, Sterne wrote to Mr. and Mrs. James that
he was “almost dead” from the bleeding. It may be supposed, if you like,
that Sterne could exaggerate or even sham an illness to awaken Eliza’s
pity for him, but he could have had no motive for deceiving his friends
in Gerrard street. Without much doubt the correct date for the letter is
Tuesday, April 23, 1765. As he sat in the Mount Coffee-house, Sterne was
debating within himself whether he should pass the evening with Lady
Percy, or attend the benefit to be given at Covent Garden to Miss
Wilford, a popular dancer, who was to appear on that evening as Miranda
in Mrs. Centlivre’s _Busy Body_.[9]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account