The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
Mr. Harris repeats the same mistake in a more serious form, in his
second Scholium, § 240, where he shows that the images are arranged
in the circumference of a circle. The two images =D=, _d_, says he,
coincide and make but one image. Mr. Wood has committed the very same
mistake in his second Corollary to Prop. XIV., and his demonstration
of that Corollary is decidedly erroneous. This Corollary is stated in
the following manner:—“When _a_ (the angle of the mirrors) is a measure
of 180° _two images coincide_,” and it is demonstrated, that _since
two images of any object_ =X= (Fig. 2) _must be formed_, viz., one by
each mirror, and since these two images must be formed at 180° from
the object =X=, placed between the mirrors, that is, at the same point
_x_, it follows that the two images must coincide. Now, it will appear
from the simplest considerations, that the assumption, as well as the
conclusion, is erroneous. The image _x_ is seen by the last reflexion
from the mirror =B O E=, and another image _would be seen at x_, if the
mirror =A O E= had extended as far as _x_; but as this is impossible,
without covering the part of the mirror =B O E=, which gives the first
image _x_, there can be only one image seen at _x_. When the object =X=
is equidistant from =A= and =B=, then one-half of the last reflected
image _x_ will be formed by the last reflexion from the mirror =B O=,
and the other half by the last reflexion from the mirror =A O=, and
these two half images will join each other, and form a whole image at
_e_, as perfect as any of the rest. In this last case, when the angle
=A O B= is a little different from an even aliquot part of 360°, the
eye at =E= will perceive at _e_ an appearance of two incoincident
images; but this arises from the pupil of the eye being partly on one
side of =E= and partly on the other; and, therefore, the apparent
duplication of the image is removed by looking through a very small
aperture at =E=. As the preceding remarks are equally true, whatever be
the inclination of the mirrors, provided it is an even aliquot part of
a circle, it follows,—
1. That when =A O B= is ¼, ⅙, ⅛, ⅒, ¹/₁₂, etc., of a circle, the number
of reflected images of any object =X=, is 4 - 1, 6 - 1, 8 - 1, 10 - 1,
12 - 1.
2. That when =X= is nearer one mirror than another, the number of
images seen by reflexion from the mirror to which it is nearest will
be ⁴/₂, ⁶/₂, ⁸/₂, ¹⁰/₂, ¹²/₂, while the number of images formed by the
mirror from which =X= is most distant will be ⁴/₂ - 1, ⁶/₂ - 1, ⁸/₂ -
1, ¹⁰/₂ - 1; that is, an image more always reaches the eye from the
mirror nearest =X=, than from the mirror farthest from it.
3. That when =X= is equidistant from =A O= and =B O=, the number of
images which reaches the eye from each mirror is equal, and is always
4 - 1, 6 - 1, 8 - 1, 10 - 1, 12 - 1
----- ----- ----- ------ ------
2 2 2 2 2
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account