The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts — John Shaqi
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
There is, however, one advantage, and a very important one, to be
derived from an increase of length in the mirrors, namely a diminution
of the deviation from symmetry which arises from the small height of
the eye above the plane of the mirrors, and of the small distance
of the objects from the extremity of the mirrors. As the height of
the eye must always be a certain quantity, =E _e_=, Fig. 17, above
the angular point =E=, whatever be the length of the reflectors, it
is obvious, that when the length of the reflectors is =_e_ O=, the
deviation from symmetry will be only =P _oʹ_=, whereas when the length
of the reflectors is reduced to =_eʹ_ O=, the height of the eye =_eʹ_
Eʹ= being still equal to =_e_ E=, the aberration will be increased
to =P _o_=. This advantage is certainly of considerable consequence;
but in practice the difficulty of constructing a perfect instrument,
increases with the length of the reflectors. When the plates are long,
it is more difficult to get the surface perfectly flat; the risk of a
bending in the plates is also increased, which creates the additional
difficulty of forming a good junction, on which the excellence of the
instrument so much depends. By augmenting the length of the reflectors,
the quantity of dust which collects between them is also increased,
and it is then very difficult to remove this dust, without taking the
instrument to pieces. From these causes it is advisable to limit the
greatest length of the reflectors to seven or eight inches.
CHAPTER VII.
ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE SIMPLE KALEIDOSCOPE.
In order to construct the Kaleidoscope in its most simple form, we
must procure two reflectors, about five, six, seven, or eight inches
long. These reflectors may be either rectangular plates, or plates
shaped like those represented in Fig. 1, having their broadest ends
=A O=, =B O=, from one to two inches wide, and their narrowest ends
=_a_ E=, =_b_ E=, half an inch wide. If the reflectors are of glass,
the newest plate glass should be used, as a great deal of light is
lost by employing old plate glass, with scratches or imperfections
upon its surface. The plate glass may be either quicksilvered or not,
or its posterior surface may be ground, or covered with black wax, or
black varnish, or anything else that removes its reflective power.
This, however, is by no means absolutely necessary, for if the eye
is properly placed, the reflexions from the posterior surface will
scarcely affect the distinctness of the picture, unless in very intense
lights. If it should be thought necessary to extinguish, as completely
as possible, all extraneous light that may be thrown into the tube
from the posterior surface of the glass plates, that surface should be
coated with a varnish of the same refractive and dispersive power as
the glass.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account