The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
Hitherto we have considered the effects of combining two reflectors,
by means of which the reflected images are arranged around one
centre, either visible or invisible; but it must be obvious, from
the principles already explained, that very singular effects will
be obtained from the combination of three or more reflectors. As
in instruments of this kind the reflected images are arranged
round several centres, we have distinguished them by the name of
_Polycentral_.
As 90° is the greatest angle which is an even aliquot part of 360°,
and as all regular polygons, with a greater number of sides than four,
must have their interior angles greater than 90°, it follows, that
symmetrical pictures cannot be created by any number of reflectors
greater than four, arranged like the sides of a regular polygon. If the
polygon is irregular, and consists of four sides, or more, then one of
its angles must exceed 90°, and consequently it cannot give symmetrical
patterns. In constructing Polycentral Kaleidoscopes, we are limited to
combinations of four or three reflectors.
The only modes in which we can combine four reflectors, are so as
to form a hollow square, or a hollow rectangle; but though these
combinations afford regular patterns, from their angles being even
aliquot parts of 360°, yet these figures are composed merely of a great
number of squares, or rectangles, the point where every four squares
or rectangles meet being the centre of a pattern. Those, however, who
may wish to construct such instruments, must make the plates as narrow
as possible at the eye-end, so as to bring the eye, as much as can be
done, into the plane of all the four reflectors.
In combining three reflectors, the limitation is nearly as great; but
the effect of the combination is highly pleasing. Since the angles at
which the reflectors must be placed are even aliquot parts of 360°,
such as 90°, 60°, 45°, 36°, 25-¹⁰/₁₄° 22½°, 20°, 18°, etc., which are
the quotients of 360°, divided by the even numbers, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,
14, 16, 18, 20, etc.; and since the reflectors are combined in the
form of a prism, the section of which is everywhere a triangle, the
sum of whose angles is 180°, we must select any three of the above
even aliquot parts which amount to 180°; and when the reflectors are
combined at these angles, they will afford forms perfectly symmetrical.
Now, it is obvious, that these conditions will be complied with when
the angles are—
90° + 45° + 45° = 180°
90° + 60° + 30° = 180°
60° + 60° + 60° = 180°
The Polycentral Kaleidoscopes are therefore limited to _five_ different
combinations, namely,—
1. Four reflectors of equal breadth, forming a square.
2. Four reflectors, two of which are broader than the other
two, and form, a rectangle.
3. Three reflectors at angles of 90°, 45°, and 45°.
4. Three reflectors at angles of 90°, 60°, and 30°.
5. Three reflectors at angles of 60°, 60°, and 60°.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account