The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful artsBrewster, David
Science
The kaleidoscope : $b its history, theory and construction. With its application to the fine and useful arts
Brewster, David
Kaleidoscopes
farther from, and others nearer to, the centre; and some being dark,
and others luminous; while all of them are disunited. Let him now take
a Telescopic Kaleidoscope, and direct it to the same object; he will
instantly perceive the most perfect order arise out of confusion, and
he will not scruple to acknowledge, that no two things in nature can
be more different than the effects which are produced by these two
combinations of mirrors.
[Illustration: FIG. 55.]
[Illustration: FIG. 56.]
We come now to consider the claims of Mr. Bradley, Professor of
Botany in the University of Cambridge. In a work, entitled, _New
Improvements in Planting and Gardening_, published in 1717, this
author has drawn and described Kircher’s apparatus as an invention of
his own; and, instead of having in any respect improved it, he has
actually deteriorated it, in so far as he has made the breadth of the
mirrors greater than their height. An exact copy of the mirrors used
by Bradley is shown in Fig. 55, from which it will be at once seen,
that it is precisely the same as Kircher’s, shown in Fig. 54. We are
far from saying that Bradley stole the invention from Kircher, or that
Kircher stole it from Baptista Porta, or that Baptista Porta stole it
from the ancients. There is reason, on the contrary, to think that the
apparatus had been entirely forgotten, in the long intervals which
elapsed between these different authors, and there can be no doubt that
each of them added some little improvement to the instrument of their
predecessors. Baptista Porta saw the superiority of two mirrors, as a
multiplying machine, to a greater number used by the ancients. Kircher
showed the relation between the number of images and the inclination
of the mirrors; and Bradley, though he rather injured the apparatus,
yet he had the merit of noticing, that figures upon paper, which had a
certain degree of irregularity, like those in Fig. 56, could still form
a regular figure.
In order that the reader may fully understand Bradley’s method of using
the mirrors, we shall give it in his own words:—
“We must choose two pieces of looking-glass (says he), of equal
bigness, of the figure of a long square, _five_ inches in length, and
_four_ in breadth; they must be covered on the back with paper or silk,
to prevent rubbing off the silver, which would else be too apt to crack
off by frequent use. This covering for the back of the glasses must be
so put on, that nothing of it may appear about the edges on the bright
side.
“The glasses being thus prepared, they must be laid face to face, and
hinged together, so that they may be made to open and shut at pleasure,
like the leaves of a book; and now the glasses being thus fitted for
our purpose, I shall proceed to _explain the use of them_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account