The Kansas University Quarterly, Vol. I, No. 1 (1892)Various
History
The Kansas University Quarterly, Vol. I, No. 1 (1892)
Various
Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
Length of femur 75
Diameter of head of femur 5
Diameter of femur through condyles 12
Length of pteroid bone 88
The principal dimensions of this species can be got at with
considerable certainty. Although two of the wing-phalanges and the
bones of the foot are wanting, yet the relative proportions of those
present agree so closely with those of the corresponding bones in
_Pteranodon_, that there can be but little possibility of error in
assuming the same proportions for the missing ones. The position of the
ilium and femur, as also the ribs, show that they hold their natural
relations to the pectoral arch. The tail, alone, can not be got at.
Extreme expanse of wing-bones 2400 mm. 7 ft. 10 in.
Expanse of wings in life, approximated 2000 6 6
Length of head, estimated 150 6
Length of neck 128 5½
Length of trunk 165 6½
Length of leg and foot, outstretched 275 11
But one species has been described from the American Cretaceous smaller
than the present one, _Pteranodon nanus_ Marsh, in which the expanse of
wings is given as not more than three or four feet. In this estimate
the author is certainly in error. The size of the humerus, as given,
is rather more than three-fourths that of the present species, and the
expanse, hence, must be nearly five feet in life, or six feet as the
bones lie outstretched.
As regards the specific determination of the present specimen, there
must necessarily be some doubt until the species already named have
been recognizably described. But three of the existing species can be
taken into account, _N. gracilis_, _P. comptus_ and _P. nanus_. That it
can not be the last, has already been shown. In size, it agrees well
with _P. comptus_, but the other characters throw no light upon the
identity.
The measurements given of the type specimen of _N. gracilis_ show the
size to be materially greater,—a character, however, of subordinate
value—greater slenderness, and a relatively shorter first wing-phalanx.
The relative lengths of wing-metacarpals, wing-phalanx and ulna in _N.
gracilis_ and the present specimen may be expressed as follows:
Length of wing-metacarpal 100 100
Length of first wing-phalanx 115.6 119.5
Length of ulna 62.3 60.4
It will be seen that not a single character has yet been given to
distinguish the genus from _Pterodactylus_, and it is not at all
impossible that it may prove to be the same; its location among the
_Pteranodontidae_ rests solely on the assumed absence of teeth, and
that is a character yet wholly unknown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account