The Kansas University science bulletin, Vol. I, No. 6, September 1902 — John Shaqi
The Kansas University science bulletin, Vol. I, No. 6, September 1902
Science
The Kansas University science bulletin, Vol. I, No. 6, September 1902
Science -- Periodicals
2 is normal as far as can be
seen, except that the apices are turned through a small vertical angle.
The anterior portion of the pedicle valve is crushed in. No. 12 is
normal throughout.
It is unfortunate that none of the specimens show the crural attachment
of the spiralia. Such structures must certainly vary in order to support
the spires in their various positions.
The above facts would seem to indicate the following conclusions: First,
in those spire-bearing brachiopods in which the form of the shell does
not govern the position of the spires, the Athyridæ in particular, the
spires may be subject to a considerable variation in both position and
form. Second, that the crural supports are probably so modified as to
accommodate the spires in their various positions.
In the light of the foregoing, it will be seen that in the future it
will be necessary to study the structure of several specimens before
using small variations of internal structure in these shells as bases
for group divisions.
One might expect greater individual variation among the Flint Hills
specimens, owing to the physical changes that were taking place during
the close of the Carboniferous and the early Permian; changes which soon
caused this species, together with many others, to become extinct.
However, this cannot be said of the most striking case (No. 11) from the
Topeka limestone. It would seem that such variations as are found in
Nos. 3 and 11 would be decidedly detrimental to the well-being of the
animal, though the latter of the two seems to have been a vigorous
individual.
INDIANA UNIVERSITY, BLOOMINGTON,
APRIL 8, 1902.
Explanation of Plate VI.
Drawings by Sydney Prentice, except No. 12, which is by C. McK. Beede.
All specimens natural size.
_Seminula argentia._ Variation of spires.
FIG. 1. Specimen brachial side up.
FIG. 2. This specimen shows spires viewed with pedicle side
partly removed.
FIG. 3. Pedicle view, showing part of spire.
FIG. 3_a_. Above individual, brachial side up.
FIG. 4. Brachial side of fig. 4_a_.
FIG. 4_a_. Pedicle view of specimen, showing position of spires.
FIGS. 5 and 5_a_ are the brachial and pedicle views of a somewhat
laterally compressed specimen.
FIG. 6. Pedicle view of specimen.
FIG. 6_a_. Brachial view of fig. 6.
FIGS. 7 and 7_a_ are the brachial and pedicle views of a specimen.
FIG. 8. This figure probably shows the brachial side of
specimen, while fig. 8_a_ is the opposite side.
FIG. 9. Brachial view.
FIG. 10. The pedicle view of a specimen, and fig. 10_a_ the
brachial side of the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account