The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
Abú `Alí Júzajání says: “The saint is annihilated in his own state and
subsistent in the contemplation of the Truth: he cannot tell anything
concerning himself, nor can he rest with anyone except God,” because a
man has knowledge only of his own state, and when all his states are
annihilated he cannot tell anything about himself; and he cannot rest
with anyone else, to whom he might tell his state, because to
communicate one’s hidden state to another is to reveal the secret of the
Beloved, which cannot be revealed except to the Beloved himself.
Moreover, in contemplation it is impossible to regard aught except God:
how, then, can he be at rest with mankind? Junayd said: “The saint hath
no fear, because fear is the expectation either of some future calamity
or of the eventual loss of some object of desire, whereas the saint is
the son of his time (_ibn waqtihi_): he has no future that he should
fear anything; and as he hath no fear so he hath no hope, since hope is
the expectation either of gaining an object of desire or of being
relieved from a misfortune, and this belongs to the future; nor does he
grieve, because grief arises from the rigour of time, and how should he
feel grief who is in the radiance of satisfaction (_riḍá_) and the
garden of concord (_muwáfaqat_)?” The vulgar imagine this saying to
imply that, inasmuch as the saint feels neither fear nor hope nor grief,
he has security (_amn_) in their place; but he has not security, for
security arises from not seeing that which is hidden, and from turning
one’s back on “time”; and this (absence of security) is characteristic
of those who pay no regard to their humanity (_bashariyyat_) and are not
content with attributes. Fear and hope and security and grief all refer
to the interests of the lower soul, and when that is annihilated
satisfaction (_riḍá_) becomes an attribute of Man, and when satisfaction
has been attained his states become steadfast (_mustaqím_) in vision of
the Author of states (_muḥawwil_), and his back is turned on all states.
Then saintship is revealed to his heart and its meaning is made clear to
his inmost thoughts. Abú `Uthmán Maghribí says: “The saint is sometimes
celebrated (_mashhúr_), but he is not seduced (_maftún_),” and another
says: “The saint is sometimes hidden (_mastúr_), but he is not
celebrated.” Seduction consists in falsehood: inasmuch as the saint must
be veracious, and miracles cannot possibly be performed by a liar, it
follows that the saint is incapable of being seduced. These two sayings
refer to the controversy whether the saint knows himself to be such: if
he knows, he is celebrated, and if he does not know, he is seduced; but
the explanation of this is tedious. It is related that Ibráhím b. Adham
asked a certain man whether he desired to be one of God’s saints, and on
his replying “Yes”, said: “Do not covet anything in this world or the
next, and devote thyself entirely to God, and turn to God with all thy
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account