The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
His conversion (_tawbat_) was begun by Ḥasan of Baṣra. At first he was a
usurer and committed all sorts of wickedness, but God gave him a sincere
repentance, and he learned from Ḥasan something of the theory and
practice of religion. His native tongue was Persian (_`ajamí_), and he
could not speak Arabic correctly. One evening Ḥasan of Baṣra passed by
the door of his cell. Ḥabíb had uttered the call to prayer and was
standing, engaged in devotion. Ḥasan came in, but would not pray under
his leadership, because Ḥabíb was unable to speak Arabic fluently or
recite the Koran correctly. The same night, Ḥasan dreamed that he saw
God and said to Him: “O Lord, wherein does Thy good pleasure consist?”
and that God answered: “O Ḥasan, you found My good pleasure, but did not
know its value: if yesternight you had said your prayers after Ḥabíb,
and if the rightness of his intention had restrained you from taking
offence at his pronunciation, I should have been well pleased with you.”
It is common knowledge among Ṣúfís that when Ḥasan of Baṣra fled from
Ḥajjáj he entered the cell of Ḥabíb. The soldiers came and said to
Ḥabíb: “Have you seen Ḥasan anywhere?” Ḥabíb said: “Yes.” “Where is he?”
“He is in my cell.” They went into the cell, but saw no one there.
Thinking that Ḥabíb was making fun of them, they abused him and called
him a liar. He swore that he had spoken the truth. They returned twice
and thrice, but found no one, and at last departed. Ḥasan immediately
came out and said to Ḥabíb: “I know it was owing to thy benedictions
that God did not discover me to these wicked men, but why didst thou
tell them I was here?” Ḥabíb replied: “O Master, it was not on account
of my benedictions that they failed to see thee, but through the
blessedness of my speaking the truth. Had I told a lie, we both should
have been shamed.” Ḥabíb was asked: “With what thing is God pleased?” He
answered: “With a heart which is not sullied by hypocrisy,” because
hypocrisy (_nifáq_) is the opposite of concord (_wifáq_), and the state
of being well pleased (_riḍá_) is the essence of concord. There is no
connexion between hypocrisy and love, and love subsists in the state of
being well pleased (with whatever is decreed by God). Therefore
acquiescence (_riḍá_) is a characteristic of God’s friends, while
hypocrisy is a characteristic of His enemies. This is a very important
matter. I will explain it in another place.
2. MÁLIK B. DÍNÁR.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account