"The diocesan prelate, as superior ecclesiastical authority, may
make public this spontaneous manifestation, to make reparation
for the scandals which may have been caused by my works, and that
God and my fellow-men may pardon me."
"Manila 29th December 1896.--José Rizal.--Witnesses: Juan del
Fresno, Chief of Picket.--Eloy Maure, Adjutant."
He also entered the holy bonds of matrimony with the young woman
with whom he had been living for some time in Mindanao. On the way
to the place of his execution he remarked to one of the Fathers who
accompanied him. Father, it is my pride that has brought me here."
Of the political error committed by the Spanish Authorities in
the execution of Rizal, I do not hold myself up as a judge. All
governments, like human beings, commit mistakes and at times grave
ones. The Spanish authorities, feeling themselves justified in so
doing, ordered the execution of the prisoner who was responsible
for one of the most bloody revolts since the time of the French
revolution: the pattern taken by the Filipino leaders, for the means
of the foundation of the Filipino republic. Rizal was executed on the
Luneta. To assert that he was offered up as a victim to gratify the
wishes of the Religious Orders is but a crude and vicious argument
worthy of its inventors and propagators. Nothing, absolutely nothing,
can be brought forward to prove such an assertion, but on the contrary,
those members of the Religious Orders who concerned themselves in
the stirring affairs of the revolution were, as a very general rule,
opposed to harsh and extreme measures being taken; and among these
was the Illustrious Archbishop of Manila, Sr. Nozaleda, a noble,
tenderhearted and compassionate prelate, a prelate who has been dubbed
by Foreman as "the blood-thirsty Archbishop". Had the friars held the
reins of government as they are stated to have done, history would not
have to record the names of so many, many people who were executed:
people who were scarcely to be held as guilty, in as much as they
were but sheep who thoughtlessly followed their shepherds without
even looking to see where the road they trod would lead them.
In politics Rizal had his party composed of a number of insignificant
petty-lawyers, petty-doctors and others possessing academic titles and
a semi-formed cerebral power. These were backed by a mass of the people
of Calamba, Rizal's birthplace. In their eyes he was a "Messiah", a
"Mahdi", their prophet and redeemer. As an individual he was bright
and intelligent, and had he not been led astray by those who made a
"cat's paw" of him, and who cruelly deserted him in his hour of need,
he would doubtless have been one of the foremost Filipinos of to-day
in that sphere of life in which God had placed him.
A Spanish proverb says: "In blind man's land the one eyed man is a
king." Rizal was a king.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account