Domestic fiction; Ireland -- Fiction; Land tenure -- Fiction; Landlord and tenant -- Fiction; Landowners -- Fiction
“There’s old Kemmis,” as they caught a glimpse of the Crown agent;
“he’s the boy that doctored the jury list. Fancy, a jury chosen out of
all Dublin, and not one Catholic! As if that could be fair!” And then
he named the different judges. “Look at that big-headed, pig-faced
fellow on the right—that’s Pennefather! He’s the blackest sheep of the
lot—and the head of them! He’s a thoroughbred Tory, and as fit to be a
judge as I am to be a general. That queer little fellow, with the long
chin, he’s Burton—he’s a hundred if he’s a day—he was fifty when he was
called, seventy when they benched him, and I’m sure he’s a judge thirty
years! But he’s the sharpest chap of the whole twelve, and no end of a
boy afther the girls. If you only saw him walking in his robes—I’m sure
he’s not three feet high! That next, with the skinny neck, he’s
Crampton—he’s one of Father Mathews lads, an out and out teetotaller,
and he looks it; he’s a desperate cross fellow, sometimes! The other
one, you can’t see, he’s Perrin. There, he’s leaning over—you can just
catch the side of his face—he’s Perrin. It’s he’ll acquit the
traversers av’ anything does—he’s a fair fellow, is Perrin, and not a
red-hot thorough-going Tory like the rest of ’em.”
Here John was obliged to give over the instruction of his brother,
being enjoined so to do by one of the heavy-hatted policemen in his
front, who enforced his commands for silence, with a backward shove of
his wooden truncheon, which came with rather unnecessary violence
against the pit of John’s stomach.
The fear of being turned out made him for the nonce refrain from that
vengeance of abuse which his education as a Dublin Jackeen well
qualified him to inflict. But he put down the man’s face in his
retentive memory, and made up his mind to pay him off.
And now the business of the day commenced. After some official delays
and arrangements Sheil arose, and began his speech in defence of John
O’Connell. It would be out of place here to give either his words or
his arguments; besides, they have probably before this been read by all
who would care to read them. When he commenced, his voice appeared, to
those who were not accustomed to hear him, weak, piping, and most unfit
for a popular orator; but this effect was soon lost in the elegance of
his language and the energy of his manner; and, before he had been ten
minutes on his legs, the disagreeable tone was forgotten, though it was
sounding in the eager ears of every one in the Court.
His speech was certainly brilliant, effective, and eloquent; but it
satisfied none that heard him, though it pleased all. It was neither a
defence of the general conduct and politics of the party, such as
O’Connell himself attempted in his own case, nor did it contain a chain
of legal arguments to prove that John O’Connell, individually, had not
been guilty of conspiracy, such as others of the counsel employed
subsequently in favour of their own clients.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account