The Kentish CoastHarper, Charles G. (Charles George)
History
The Kentish Coast
Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
Kent (England) -- Description and travel
The creeks hereabouts--“cricks” they are called locally--and the
marshes, or “meshes” in the speech of Kent, are not scenically
beautiful nor in any way spectacular, but the brick-barges, gliding by,
do at least give, with their great rusty-red sails, a quaint touch.
Scarce a duller spot could be found for the scene of an historic
incident, but the incident of James the Second being brought here, a
prisoner, was itself drab and unheroic. The fishermen who had seized
the fugitive King on the long low spit of Shellness did not at first
know how important was their capture, that cold December day. The
humble hoy was a strange vessel for the conveyance of such gentlefolk
as these appeared to be, and the fact, in itself, was suspicious in
those troubled times; but the fisherfolk’s thoughts did not rise to
the contemplation of a monarch leaving his kingdom in that evasive
way. Probably, if the truth of it were known, their idea of a king
was that of a personage splendid in appearance and wearing a crown;
certainly it was not this tall, thin-faced man, of mingled careworn
and severe expression of countenance, and habited in unrelieved black,
who was masquerading as chaplain to Sir Edward Hales, the gentleman
who appeared to be the chief among the party they had detained. The
fishermen, indeed, took them for escaping Jesuits, and thought the
King to be that most notorious of them all, Father Petre. “I know him
by his lean jaws,” exclaimed one, and another advocated searching
“the hatchet-faced old Jesuit,” a suggestion acted upon in earnest.
They snatched his money and watch--those they could understand and
appraise; but his Coronation Ring and a number of little trinkets he
carried they left untouched, together with the diamond buckles of
his shoes, which they took to be glass. What indignities to offer
the Lord’s Anointed! Then some person recognised him. It was a great
moment, and I wonder no painter has ever made that tableau the subject
of a picture. Perhaps it would have been done had the King presented
a better front. Monarchs are by courtesy “gracious,” and they are
supposed, in addition, to be dignified and courageous; but this poor
James became, under these circumstances, a distressingly mean figure.
Why should he at this juncture have proved a coward: he who, when Duke
of York and Lord High Admiral, had shown notable courage: he who, three
years before, had been contemptuous of the pitiful appeals for mercy
made by Monmouth?
[Illustration: THE TOWN HALL, FAVERSHAM.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account