The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. The members of the Theosophical Society at large are free to
profess whatever religion or philosophy they like, or none if
they so prefer, provided they are in sympathy with, and ready to
carry out one or more of the three objects of the Association.
The Society is a philanthropic and scientific body for the
propagation of the idea of brotherhood on _practical_ instead of
_theoretical_ lines. The Fellows may be Christians or Mussulmen,
Jews or Parsees, Buddhists or Brahmins, Spiritualists or
Materialists, it does not matter; but every member must be either
a philanthropist, or a scholar, a searcher into Aryan and other
old literature, or a psychic student. In short, he has to help,
if he can, in the carrying out of at least one of the objects
of the programme. Otherwise he has no reason for becoming a
“Fellow.” Such are the majority of the exoteric Society, composed
of “attached” and “unattached” members.[6] These may, or may not,
become Theosophists _de facto_. Members they are, by virtue of
their having joined the Society; but the latter cannot make a
Theosophist of one who has no sense for the _divine_ fitness of
things, or of him who understands Theosophy in his own—if the
expression may be used—_sectarian_ and egotistic way. “Handsome
is, as handsome does” could be paraphrased in this case and be
made to run: “Theosophist is, who Theosophy does.”
THEOSOPHISTS AND MEMBERS OF THE “T.S.”
ENQ. This applies to lay members, as I understand. And what of those
who pursue the esoteric study of Theosophy; are they the real
Theosophists?
THEO. Not necessarily, until they have proven themselves to be such.
They have entered the inner group and pledged themselves to
carry out, as strictly as they can, the rules of the occult
body. This is a difficult undertaking, as the foremost rule of
all is the entire renunciation of one’s personality—_i.e._, a
_pledged_ member has to become a thorough altruist, never to
think of himself, and to forget his own vanity and pride in the
thought of the good of his fellow-creatures, besides that of his
fellow-brothers in the esoteric circle. He has to live, if the
esoteric instructions shall profit him, a life of abstinence in
everything, of self-denial and strict morality, doing his duty by
all men. The few real Theosophists in the T.S. are among these
members. This does not imply that outside of the T.S. and the
inner circle, there are no Theosophists; for there are, and more
than people know of; certainly far more than are found among the
lay members of the T.S.
ENQ. Then what is the good of joining the so-called Theosophical
Society in that case? Where is the incentive?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account