The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. Of course I can. We have to contend against (1) the hatred of the
Spiritualists, American, English, and French; (2) the constant
opposition of the clergy of all denominations; (3) especially
the relentless hatred and persecution of the missionaries in
India; (4) this led to the famous and infamous attack on our
Theosophical Society by the Society for Psychical Research, an
attack which was stirred up by a regular conspiracy organized by
the missionaries in India. Lastly, we must count the defection
of various prominent (?) members, for reasons I have already
explained, all of whom have contributed their utmost to increase
the prejudice against us.
ENQ. Cannot you give me more details about these, so that I may know
what to answer when asked—a brief history of the Society, in
short; and why the world believes all this?
THEO. The reason is simple. Most outsiders knew absolutely nothing of
the Society itself, its motives, objects or beliefs. From its very
beginning the world has seen in Theosophy nothing but certain
marvellous phenomena, in which two-thirds of the non-spiritualists
do not believe. Very soon the Society came to be regarded as a
body pretending to the possession of “miraculous” powers. The
world never realised that the Society taught absolute disbelief
in _miracle_ or even the possibility of such; that in the Society
there were only a few people who possessed such psychic powers
and but few who cared for them. Nor did it understand that the
phenomena were never produced publicly, but only privately for
friends, and merely given as an accessory, to prove by direct
demonstration that such things could be produced without dark
rooms, spirits, mediums, or any of the usual paraphernalia.
Unfortunately, this misconception was greatly strengthened and
exaggerated by the first book on the subject which excited much
attention in Europe—Mr. Sinnett’s “_Occult World_.” If this work
did much to bring the Society into prominence, it attracted still
more obloquy, derision and misrepresentation upon the hapless
heroes and heroine thereof. Of this the author was more than
warned in the _Occult World_, but did not pay attention to the
_prophecy_—for such it was, though half-veiled.
ENQ. For what, and since when, do the Spiritualists hate you?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account