The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. It is; but you must bear in mind how many powerful adversaries we
have aroused ever since the formation of our Society. As I just
said, if the Theosophical movement were one of those numerous
modern crazes, as harmless at the end as they are evanescent, it
would be simply laughed at—as it is now by those who still do not
understand its real purport—and left severely alone. But it is
nothing of the kind. Intrinsically, Theosophy is the most serious
movement of this age; and one, moreover, which threatens the very
life of most of the time-honoured humbugs, prejudices, and social
evils of the day—those evils which fatten and make happy the upper
ten and their imitators and sycophants, the wealthy dozens of the
middle classes, while they positively crush and starve out of
existence the millions of the poor. Think of this, and you will
easily understand the reason of such a relentless persecution by
those others who, more observant and perspicacious, do see the
true nature of Theosophy, and therefore dread it.
ENQ. Do you mean to tell me that it is because a few have understood
what Theosophy leads to, that they try to crush the movement? But
if Theosophy leads only to good, surely you cannot be prepared to
utter such a terrible accusation of perfidious heartlessness and
treachery even against those few?
THEO. I am so prepared, on the contrary. I do not call the enemies we
have had to battle with during the first nine or ten years of the
Society’s existence either powerful or “dangerous”; but only those
who have arisen against us in the last three or four years. And
these neither speak, write nor preach against Theosophy, but work
in silence and behind the backs of the foolish puppets who act as
their visible _marionnettes_. Yet if _invisible_ to most of the
members of our Society, they are well known to the true “Founders”
and the protectors of our Society. But they must remain for
certain reasons unnamed at present.
ENQ. And are they known to many of you, or to yourself alone?
THEO. I never said _I_ knew them. I may or may not know them—but I know
_of them_, and this is sufficient; and _I defy them to do their
worst_. They may achieve great mischief and throw confusion
into our ranks, especially among the faint-hearted, and those
who can judge only by appearances. _They will not crush the
Society_, do what they may. Apart from these truly dangerous
enemies—“dangerous,” however, only to those Theosophists who
are unworthy of the name, and whose place is rather _outside_
than _within_ the T.S.—the number of our opponents is more than
considerable.
ENQ. Can you name these, at least, if you will not speak of the others?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account