The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. In what way can such an accusation injure her in reality? Did she
ever make money on their presumed existence, or derive benefit,
or fame, therefrom? I answer that she has gained only insults,
abuse, and calumnies, which would have been very painful had she
not learned long ago to remain perfectly indifferent to such
false charges. For what does it amount to, after all? Why, to an
_implied compliment_, which, if the fools, her accusers, were not
carried away by their blind hatred, they would have thought twice
before uttering. To say that she has invented the Masters comes
to this: She must have invented every bit of philosophy that has
ever been given out in Theosophical literature. She must be the
author of the letters from which “Esoteric Buddhism” was written;
the sole inventor of every tenet found in the “Secret Doctrine,”
which, if the world were just, would be recognised as supplying
many of the missing links of science, as will be discovered a
hundred years hence. By saying what they do, they are also giving
her the credit of being far cleverer than the hundreds of men,
(many _very_ clever and not a few scientific men,) who believe in
what she says—inasmuch as she must have fooled them all! If they
speak the truth, then she must be several Mahatmas rolled into one
like a nest of Chinese boxes; since among the so-called “Mahatma
letters” are many in totally different and distinct styles, all of
which her accusers declare that she has written.
ENQ. It is just what they say. But is it not very painful to her to be
publicly denounced as “the most accomplished impostor of the age,
whose name deserves to pass to posterity,” as is done in the
Report of the “Society for Psychical Research”?
THEO. It might be painful if it were true, or came from people less
rabidly materialistic and prejudiced. As it is, personally she
treats the whole matter with contempt, while the Mahatmas simply
laugh at it. In truth, it is the greatest compliment that could be
paid to her. I say so, again.
ENQ. But her enemies claim to have proved their case.
THEO. Aye, it is easy enough to make such a claim when you have
constituted yourself judge, jury, and prosecuting counsel at
once, as they did. But who, except their direct followers and our
enemies, believe in it?
ENQ. But they sent a representative to India to investigate the matter,
didn’t they?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account