The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837Various
History
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837
Various
Periodicals
The Mohegan is readily recognised as a type of the Algonquin or (as
Mr. Gallatin has recently denominated it,) the 'Lenapee-Algonkin'
family, and bears a strong resemblance, both in sound and syntax,
to the dialects of some of the existing lake tribes. This affinity
is very striking in its grammatical structure, and its primitive
words. Derivatives, with all our tribes, are subject to interchange
their consonants, or drop them entirely, which creates a necessity of
being constantly on the alert to detect these exchanges. Moreover,
the accent is uniformly moved, or doubled, often creating primary
and secondary accents in the same phrase, which, in an unwritten
language, is alone sufficient to account for numerous mutations. But
what, more than any other principle, affects the _sound_ of Indian
words, in their concrete and derivative states, is the large stock
of (so to say) floating particles, which come into these words in
the shape of prefixes and suffixes. These are, in their offices,
almost as numerous as the purposes of person, tense, number, quality,
position, etc., may require. But while their respective office
remains precisely the same, in almost any given number of dialects
in a mother language, it is found that the several tribes pique
themselves in giving these auxiliary particles a sound peculiar to
themselves, by which something like _nationality_ is kept up. Thus
in two dialects indicating the least change in the primitives or
derivatives, to be found among all the tribes, namely, the Chippewa
and Ottowa, these particles, which, in the animate class for plural,
are denoted by UG, and in the local inflections by ONG, and ING, in
the one dialect, are respectively changed to UK, ONK, and INK, in the
other.
Similar to this process, seems to have been the result of change
between the ancient Algonquin and the Mohegan, the latter, like the
Ottowa, constantly substituting K for G, and P for B, etc., but in
other respects, it exhibits numerous gutturals, and some aspirates,
which are but rarely found in the liquid flow of the Algic. It also
embraces the (perhaps) Gothic sound of TH, which is wholly unknown
(the Shawnee excepted) to the modern lake dialects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account