The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837 — John Shaqi
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837Various
History
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837
Various
Periodicals
No dependence, of course, can be placed on this history, obtained in
such a manner, and by a people unacquainted with letters. Commencing
on historic ground, as early as the Christian era, and as late as
the Antonines, the Goths were established toward the mouth of the
Vistula, and in that fertile province where the commercial cities of
Thorn, Elbing, Köningsberg, and Dantzic, were long afterward founded.
In the reign of Antonines, the Goths were still seated in Prussia.
About the reign of Alexander Severus, the Roman province of Dacia
had already experienced their proximity, by frequent and destructive
inroads. In this interval, therefore, of about seventy years, Gibbon
places the second migration of the Goths from the Baltic to the
Euxine.
Another, and perhaps a more plausible theory, for the origin of
the Goths, is that of identifying them with the Thracians. This
theory is strongly advocated by Vans Kennedy, who adduces many and
conclusive arguments in favor of his hypothesis. Then to identify
the Scandinavians with the Goths, and their origin is settled. From
the time of Herodotus, until the general prevalence of the name of
Goths, it is undeniable, that the Thracians remained unconquered,
and that they extended themselves from Macedonia to the Dniester,
and from the Euxine Sea to the confines of Germany. For, as the Getæ
are identified by ancient writers with the Thracians, and as neither
proof nor probability supports the assumption that Thracia was ever
occupied by either Scythians or Scandinavians, it must necessarily
follow, that whatever is predicated of the Getæ, must equally apply
to the Thracians; and, consequently, if the Getæ were Goths, the
Goths were also Thracians. To determine, therefore, the identity of
the Getæ and Goths, it may be remarked, that from Strabo, it appears
that the country immediately to the south of the Elbe was inhabited
by the Suevi; then succeeded the country of the Getæ, which extended
along the southern bank of the Danube, and also to the north of that
river, as far as the Dniester. The Moesi, likewise, dwelt on both
banks of the Danube, and were equally with the Getæ considered by the
Greeks to be a Thracian people. The Dacians, also, were a Thracian
people.'[4]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account