The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837Various
History
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1837
Various
Periodicals
The owners of bright eyes have astronomy enough to recognise
Venus, the beautiful star of evening; and yet they perversely and
anti-mythologically call her _it_, when they should know that _she_
is all that is now left of that beautiful being of the cestus,
who, like a wreath of foam, was born of a billow near Cythera. Let
us be consistent, and call Venus _she_, even as we call the moon
she, and her lord and master, 'the eye of the universe,' he. It
is proper to speak of Saturn, and _his_ rings, of Mars, and _his_
belligerent front; and we should, to be consistent, _she_ Pallas,
Juno, and Vesta, every one of them. Let us also call this great
heap of dirt and water which we tread on, and sail over, and speak
of, as our _mother_ earth, feminine. Our wretchedly-abused planet
is spoken of as belonging to no sex in particular, now-a-days,
although she was once called Terra and Titæa; and then she was a
beauty, and a charming one, too, as we should judge from some of her
heart-stealing, bright-eyed daughters.
Poetry demands that we still continue to sex the stars. Let us regard
Jupiter as a great big lubberly fellow, making love to the shy and
bashful Vesta, and waking up jealousy in the bosom of his elder
sweet-heart, Juno. Let us have Mars getting up assignations with the
all-loving Venus, as of old; and Saturn and Pallas felicitating each
other in the manner becoming two heads, the one so full of justice,
and the other of wisdom, as are theirs. How delectable it would be,
to fancy Madame Earth flirting with the long-yeared Herschel, to the
utter astonishment of her neighbor Mercury, who would either have to
live an old bachelor, or look up a mistress in some of the systems
which revolve in the far-off regions of space!
Our imagination has run riot long enough through the heavens; and
we therefore return back to our starting-place, the earth. We were
speaking of the incongruity of the sexual designations now in vogue.
Why is it, that once introduced, the system of sexing things was
not carried out farther? Why not give sex to a tree, a carriage, a
wind-mill, and our pantaloons, as well as to a yacht, a watch, and
every scrabbling village in the land? We love to think upon the
Mississippi as the 'Father of Waters,' and the Ohio as '_La belle
Riviere_;' for to the masculine strength and stature of the one, we
offer our admiration, and to the feminine beauty and grace of the
other, we have yielded up our heart.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account