The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 6, December 1837Various
History
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 6, December 1837
Various
Periodicals
While distinguished talents and extensive knowledge are necessary
for those who would write good books for children, a familiar
acquaintance with young minds, the fruit of much study or of
experience in instructing them, is of essential importance. For this
reason, some practical teachers have succeeded better in producing
school-books than some other men, who have possessed greater talents
and superior knowledge. But talents and knowledge, when combined
with experience, will give superior advantages. THOMAS H. GALLAUDET,
of Hartford, whose sermons have received high commendation from
English criticism, and which are among the best specimens of fine
writing which Americans have produced, if he had never engaged in
the business of teaching, might have been an elegant scholar and
a fine writer, but he could never have composed the 'Child's Book
on the Soul.' His capacity to produce works of that description
was acquired in teaching the deaf and dumb. In the institution
for their instruction, over which he presided, being concerned
with minds peculiarly uninstructed, he learned by experience the
avenues to untaught minds, and his simple works are among the finest
exhibitions of his talents. An English Review of his 'Class-Book
of Natural Theology for Common Schools and Academies,' has the
following remarks: 'This work has much heightened our opinion of
Mr. Gallaudet's talents as a writer for the young. He has learned
(by educating the deaf and dumb,) what gentle patience, and what
clear and precise explanation must be used to convey instruction
to, and fix correct ideas in, minds not yet unfolded, nor imbued
with knowledge. A book like this is no work of chance, but is the
result of great expense of time, thought, and tact, in devising and
perfecting it.'
To produce text-books for schools, such as are needed, the best
talents of the country should be put in requisition. In some
instances, such talents have been engaged on this subject; but there
is a necessity that they should be much more extensively employed
than they have hitherto been. How utterly unqualified many authors
have been to produce good school-books, their crude and ill-digested
works bear abundant testimony.
It cannot be expected that text-books for schools should contain
treatises very much in detail on some of the sciences to which they
relate, and hence they should be very select in their materials. In
constructing them, it requires as much judgment to know what to omit,
as what to insert. Text-books on the sciences for schools should be
peculiarly simple and perspicuous in their language, and clear as
day-light in their arrangement and their illustrations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 6, December 1837 — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account