The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 3, September 1843 — John Shaqi
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 3, September 1843Various
General
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 3, September 1843
Various
Periodicals
For the same reason, too, all secret societies are deemed dangerous
to the community, and our people will not endure them because they
are foreign to the character of our government. And how are they
foreign, it is asked? Each voter being a part of the government,
he wants all the facts of the country before him in order to form
his opinion, which he cannot have if secret societies exist. In a
despotism the power being in one head, that head alone has need of
the facts we refer to; the governed have no interest except to obey,
no duty but to submit. To refer to an almost forgotten question, the
rights of Free Masons, the opposition and abuse they received was
far less against them as Masons, than as asking for protection and
privilege, without being willing to yield any thing to that public
sentiment which they were opposing by their very existence as a
secret society.
Let us draw here one other inference from what has been said, and
then to work: a free and untrammeled press is as essential to a
free government as air is to life. If the art of printing had been
known by the ancient republics they might still have existed. And,
moreover, we may demand, as a right, to know any and all of the
affairs of others which may, by possibility, act upon this public
trust, of which each man is part keeper. And the advantage of this
supervision is mutual, for it is well for every one to know that
the whole country has an interest in what he does, in his acts, his
habits, and especially in his opinions.
Rufus Gilbert courted this scrutiny, and took pains to open his
views to all who visited him; but he became unpopular at first with
the church in his neighborhood, because he did not come under its
wing and ask its influence--an influence always to be obtained by
paying for it. Both political parties called him a fool and fanatic,
because he did not immediately set down his political opinions and
promise his vote for or against men he had never seen or heard of
before.
To the Whig committee-man who called to ask his support for that
party, he propounded first the question, 'Is your candidate a
temperance man?'
'Really, Sir, we have little to do with such narrow questions; I
can't answer you.'
'Is he for or against slavery?' next proposed Rufus.
'That, too, is beyond my instructions.'
'What then, may I ask,' said Rufus, 'are the grounds upon which you
ask my vote for your candidate?'
'Grounds, Sir!--zounds!' said the emissary, looking about for a
convenient stump, 'grounds, did you say? Sir, he is a Whig; he was
born a Whig; he has lived a Whig, and will die a Whig. What more can
you ask? He never opposes his party; he is a man we can rely upon;
we know where to find him; he is a man to stick to the party, if the
party go to the d--l; and that's what I call being a patriot.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account