The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of ViennaDrane, Augusta Theodosia
History
The Knights of St. John : $b with the Battle of Lepanto and Siege of Vienna
Drane, Augusta Theodosia
Knights of Malta; Lepanto, Battle of, Greece, 1571; Vienna (Austria) -- History -- Siege, 1683
Yet the Hospitallers had their enemies; those who had plundered and
destroyed one order, and given it up to centuries of defamation,
would willingly have done the same by its survivor. It was said
of them that they never gave alms;—scarcely an accusation, had it
even been true, if indeed they kept their subjects from the need of
alms-giving; but false, unless we leave out of sight the hospital
and its vast system of charity daily dispensed in grand and lavish
profusion. And that they did not spare themselves in their exertions
to meet the expenses of that system, is evident from the law made
about that time limiting the table of the knights to a single
dish. The Hospitallers had been nominally declared heirs to the
unfortunate Templars; yet, save the odium attaching to the suspicion
of possessing enormous wealth, they gained little by the decree; for
in almost every country, with the exception of England, the property
of the suppressed order found its way into the royal coffers.
Villeneuve, and the grand masters who succeeded him, were unsparing
in their efforts to maintain the primitive and religious character
of the order; and though, doubtless, there were abuses to reform,
yet if we read the repeated remonstrances addressed to them from the
Pontiffs, the accusations do not come to much. “There is a general
feeling,” writes Clement V., “that you do not make a very good
use of your money; it is said you keep fine horses, are superbly
dressed, keen dogs and birds of prey, and neglect the defence of
Christendom.” It must be allowed that these charges are somewhat
vague. The real crime of the Hospitallers in the eyes of those who
incessantly endeavoured to poison the minds of the Pontiffs against
them, was their supposed wealth, which their accusers longed to
sequestrate, and which, though greatly exaggerated, was made the
pretence for throwing on them the chief burden of the Turkish war.
During its long continuance they bore a part which should at least
have acquitted them from the charge of slothfulness in the cause of
Christendom. A new league having been formed against the infidels
between the Pope, the king of Cyprus, the republic of Venice, and the
Order of St. John, it was Biandra prior of Lombardy who led their
forces in the attack on Smyrna, which he carried, sword in hand,
at the head of his knights. Later, when the league was falling to
pieces, it was revived by the grand master Deodato de Gozon. This
Deodato was a very hero of romance—a second St. George, were we
to credit the popular story of his combat with the dragon.[4] In
his own day he deserved to receive the title of the “Magnanimous.”
Immediately on his election he sailed in quest of the Turkish fleet,
which he found at the little isle of Embro, near the mouth of the
Dardanelles. Falling on it by surprise, he gained a brilliant
victory, and captured 118 of the enemy’s vessels; and on returning
from this exploit, he found the ambassadors of the king of Armenia
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account