The Lake Dwellings of Ireland: Or ancient lacustrine habitations of Erin, commonly called crannogs. — John Shaqi
The Lake Dwellings of Ireland: Or ancient lacustrine habitations of Erin, commonly called crannogs.Wood-Martin, W. G. (William Gregory)
History
The Lake Dwellings of Ireland: Or ancient lacustrine habitations of Erin, commonly called crannogs.
Wood-Martin, W. G. (William Gregory)
Lake-dwellers and lake-dwellings -- Ireland
The Irish lake dwellings have, over and over again, yielded articles
precisely similar to the annexed list,[16] but as a rule they are more
prolific in objects of early manufacture, which, from their style of
ornamentation, are commonly referred to a period from the fifth to
the tenth century. Dr. Munro remarks, that although we cannot “argue
definitely from the present geographical distribution of Scottish lake
dwellings, the indications are so clearly suggestive of their having
been peculiar to those districts formerly occupied by Celtic races,
that the significance of this generalization cannot be overlooked.”
The unlooked-for discovery of lake dwellings in Yorkshire, resembling
those of Ireland and Scotland, proves that in Britain also there had
been a lacustrine population in times probably prehistoric. During the
execution of drainage operations in the Holderness district, bone tools
and fragments of piles were exhumed: this led to the discovery of the
remains of lake dwellings. The excavations made it apparent that the
construction, as is observable also in many Irish crannogs, was of two
ages--the stone and the bronze. In the upper stratum, bronze objects,
then rude stone, flint, and bone weapons. As in the Irish so in the
British remains, the very dressing of the timber framework demonstrates
the fact of the constructors having worked in the lower portion with
stone, and in the upper with metal hatchets.
It may be remarked that the great city of London seems to have risen
from a collection of rude pile dwellings, as traces of these structures
have been found both near London-Wall and at Southwark. They are thus
described by General Lane-Fox:--“Upon looking over the ground, my
attention was at once attracted by a number of piles, the decayed tops
of which appeared above the unexcavated portions of the peat, dotted
here and there over the whole of the space cleared.… Commencing on the
south, a row of them ran north and south on the west side: to the right
of these a curved row, as if forming part of a ring. Higher up, and
running obliquely across the ground, was a row of piles having a plank
about an inch and half thick, and a foot broad, placed along the south
face, as if binding the piles together.… The points of the piles were
inserted from one to two feet in the gravel, and were for the most part
well preserved, but all the tops had rotted off at about two feet above
the gravel, which must have been the surface of the ground, or of the
water at the time these structures were in existence.”[17] The vast
majority of the relics belonged to the Roman era, but there were others
of ruder workmanship. The kitchen middens contained cockle, mussel,
oyster, and periwinkle shells: amongst the animal remains were those of
the red deer, horse, wild boar, goat, dog, and the _Bos-primigenius_,
_Trochoceros_, _Longifrons_, and _Frontosus_. The superincumbent strata
varied from 18 to 21 feet in depth. The Thames, formerly a less deep
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account