The Lame Lover: A Comedy in Three ActsFoote, Samuel
General
The Lame Lover: A Comedy in Three Acts
Foote, Samuel
Comedy plays; English drama -- 18th century
Mrs. CIRCUIT, _Mrs. Gardner_.
CHARLOT, _Mrs. Jewell_.
Mrs. SIMPER, _Mrs. Saunders_.
BETTY, _Mrs. Read_.
THE LAME LOVER.
ACT I.
_Enter_ Serjeant CIRCUIT _and_ CHARLOT.
CHARLOT.
I tell you, Sir, his love to me is all a pretence: it is amazing that
you, who are so acute, so quick in discerning on other occasions,
should be so blind upon this.
SERJEANT.
But where are your proofs, Charlot? What signifies your opening matters
which your evidence cannot support?
CHARLOT.
Surely, Sir, strong circumstances in every court should have weight.
SERJEANT.
So they have collaterally, child, that is by way as it were of
corroboration, or where matters are doubtful; then indeed, as Plowden
wisely observes "Les circonstances ajout beaucoup depoids aux
faits."--You understand me?
CHARLOT.
Not perfectly well.
SERJEANT.
Then to explain by case in point; A, we will suppose, my dear, robs B
of a watch upon Hounslow heath--dy'e mind, child?
CHARLOT.
I do, Sir.
SERJEANT.
A, is taken up and indicted; B swears positively to the identity of
A.--Dy'e observe?
CHARLOT.
Attentively.
SERJEANT.
Then what does me A, but sets up the alibi C, to defeat the affidavit
of B.--You take me.
CHARLOT.
Clearly.
SERJEANT.
So far you see then the ballance is even.
CHARLOT.
True.
SERJEANT.
But then to turn the scale, child, against A, in favour of B, they
produce the circumstance D, viz. B's watch found in the pocket of
A; upon which, the testimony of C being contradicted by B,--no, by
D,--why then A, that is to say C,--no D,--joining B, they convict
C,--no, no, A,--against the affidavit of C.--So this being pretty
clear, child, I leave the application to you.
CHARLOT.
Very obliging, Sir. But suppose now, Sir, it should appear that the
attention of Sir Luke Limp is directed to some other object, would not
that induce you to--
SERJEANT.
Other object! Where?
CHARLOT.
In this very house.
SERJEANT.
Here! why the girl is non compos; there's nobody here, child, but a
parcel of Abigals.
CHARLOT.
No, Sir?
SERJEANT.
No.
CHARLOT.
Yes, Sir, one person else.
SERJEANT.
Who is that?
CHARLOT.
But remember, Sir, my accusation is confined to Sir Luke.
SERJEANT.
Well, well.
CHARLOT.
Suppose then, Sir, those powerful charms which made a conquest of you,
may have extended their empire over the heart of Sir Luke?
SERJEANT.
Why, hussy, you don't hint at your mother-in-law?
CHARLOT.
Indeed, Sir, but I do.
SERJEANT.
Ay; why this is point blank treason against my sovereign authority: but
can you, Charlot, bring proof of any overt acts?
CHARLOT.
Overt acts!
SERJEANT.
Ay; that is any declaration by writing, or even word of mouth is
sufficient; then let 'em demur if they dare.
CHARLOT.
I can't say that, Sir; but another organ has been pretty explicit.
SERJEANT.
Which?
CHARLOT.
In those cases a very infallible one--the eye.
SERJEANT.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account