The Land Beyond the Forest: Facts, Figures, and Fancies from TransylvaniaGerard, E. (Emily)
History
The Land Beyond the Forest: Facts, Figures, and Fancies from Transylvania
Gerard, E. (Emily)
Transylvania (Romania) -- Description and travel
Whoever buries his dead without placing a coin in the hand of
the corpse is regarded as a pagan by the orthodox Roumanian.
“_Nu-i-de-legea-noastra_”—he is not of our law—he says of such a one;
and whosoever stands outside the Roumanian religion, be he Christian,
pagan, Jew, or Mohammedan, is invariably regarded as unclean, and
consequently whatever comes in contact with any such individual is
unclean likewise.
The Roumanian language has a special word to define this
uncleanness—_spurcat_—which corresponds somewhat to the _koscher_ and
_unkoscher_ of the Jews.
If any animal fall into a well of drinking-water, then the well
forthwith becomes _spurcat_, and _spurcat_ likewise whoever drinks of
this water. If it be a large animal, such as a calf or goat, which
has fallen into the well, then the whole water must be bailed out;
and should this fail to satisfy the conscience of any ultra-orthodox
proprietor, then the popa must be called in to read a mass over the
spot where perhaps a donkey has found a watery grave. But when it is a
man who has been drowned there, no further rehabilitation is possible
for the unlucky well, which must therefore be filled up and discarded
as quite too hopelessly _spurcat_.
Every orthodox Roumanian household possesses three different classes of
cooking and eating utensils: unclean, clean for the meat-days, and the
cleanest of all for fast-days.
The cleansing of a vessel which has, through some accident, become
_spurcat_ is only conceded in the case of very large and expensive
articles, such as barrels and tubs; copious ablutions of holy-water,
besides thorough scouring, scraping, and rubbing, being resorted
to in such cases. All other utensils which do not come under this
denomination must simply be thrown away, or at best employed for
feeding the domestic animals. The Roumanian who does not strictly
observe all these regulations is himself _spurcat_.
This same measure he applies to all individuals whom he considers to
be clean or unclean, according to their observance of these rules. The
uncleanliness, according to him, does not lie in the individual, but in
his laws, which fail to enforce cleanliness; the law it is, therefore,
which is unclean, _lege spurcat_, which, for the Roumanian, is
synonymous with unchristian. For instance, a man who eats horse-flesh
is by him regarded as a pagan.
This recognition of the uncleanliness of most of his fellow-creatures
is, however, wholly independent of either hatred or contempt on the
part of the Roumanian, who, on the contrary, shows much interest in
foreign countries and habits; and when he wishes to affirm the high
character of a stranger, he says of him that he is a man who keeps his
own law—_tine la legea lui_—spite of which the Roumanian will refuse
to wear the coat or eat off the plate of this honorable stranger, and
would regard any such familiarity as a deadly sin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive