The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monumentsGarstang, John
History
The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monuments
Garstang, John
Hittites; Turkey -- Antiquities
718 B.C. Fall of Carchemish; Assyrian troops enter Asia Minor
(p. 388).
712 B.C. Tabal (Taurus) conquered; 709, fall of Marash (p. 389).
FOOTNOTES
[1] We regard, however, the sculptures of Mount Sipylus (Pl. LIII.) and
of Kara-Bel (Pl. LIV.) as witnesses to the possession of inland passes
leading to the Lydian coast.
[2] In particular the Lycians (Lukki), who appear among the Hittite
allies in the time of Rameses II., and later with the sea-peoples in the
reign of Merenptah.
[3] There is no evidence to enable us to include the ‘Vannic’ monuments.
Cf. Sayce’s _Herodotus_ (London, 1883), App. iv. p. 424 and below, pp.
54, 385; we exclude also as capable of other interpretation isolated
discoveries of moveable monuments, like those at Kedabeg (Messerschmidt,
_Corpus Inscrip. Hettiticarum, Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatischen
Gesellschaft_, 1900, Pt. v. No. 1.), at Babylon (_op. cit._, Nos. 3, 4,
5), and Nineveh (_ibid._, Pl. XXXIX. Nos. 2-9), etc. The inscribed stone
reported as found near Erzerum, now in the museum at Constantinople, No.
1193, is of doubtful provenance (_op. cit._, 1906, Pt. v. pp. 7, 8).
[4] These Hittite sites are shown on the map, to face p. 390.
[5] Mr. Hogarth, writing in the _Recueil de Travaux_, xvii., records that
during his journeyings up through the valley he never saw nor heard of
any pre-Hellenic monuments on the north side of the river.
[6] For these routes see Hogarth, _Recueil de Travaux_, XV. p. 29, and
in Macan’s _Herodotus_ (1895), App. XIII. § 9; also Ramsay, _Historical
Geography_, pp. 35, 46 ff.
[7] For the modern condition and ancient importance of this region, see
further: Layard, _Nineveh and Babylon_, p. 94; Peters, _Nippur_, i. p.
81; Maspero, _The Struggle of the Nations_ (London, 1896), pp. 144 and
ff.; and _The Passing of Empires_ (1900), p. 35, with an illustration.
[8] Here also the Euphrates is still our eastern boundary; for
Tell-Ahmar, the scene of Mr. Hogarth’s recent discoveries (p. 129),
though on the further side, is on the water’s edge; and the few monuments
found further east, like the seal from Urfa (Messerschmidt, _op.
cit._, _C.I.H._ 1900, Pl. XLI. No. 3), and the palace sculptures of
Tell-Halaf (Von Oppenheim, _Der alte Orient_, 1908, Heft 1), which owe
something to Hittite influence, are not definite enough to imply Hittite
occupation. That the river separated the land of Mitanni from the Hatti
is substantiated by the archives of Boghaz-Keui (Winckler, _Mitteilungen
der D. Orient._-Ges. 1907, No. 35). On the relation of Mitanni to Hittite
see below, pp. 58, note 1, 324, note 2.
[9] Pronounced _Afreen_.
[10] See Plates XXXV., XLIII.
[11] We noticed this effect especially at Karadinek, August 1907.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account