[623] These details were in vogue throughout the whole range of Hittite art at Sinjerli: see pp. 275, 289. Cf. also Pl. XXIV. (ii). [624] P. 252: on the question of date, see below, p. 367. [625] There is no analogy to date this object earlier than the ninth or tenth century B.C. Cf. pp. 210, 301. [626] Ramsay, _Jour. Roy. Asiatic Society_ (N.S.), xv. p. 116, with sketch plan. [627] Perrot, _op. cit._, fig. 335, represents the right-hand figure with head-dress serrated, but this marking seems to be the weathering of the stone. [628] Perrot, _op. cit._, fig. 336, Pl. LXIII.; Macridy Bey, _op. cit._, fig. 28, p. 21. [629] _Loc. cit._, also _Recueil de Travaux_, xiv. p. 91 and fig. 5. [630] Cf. Pls. XLIV. and XLVII. [631] Pl. LXV., p. 223 (Nos. 3, 4, R.). [632] Winckler, _Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft_ (Berlin, 1907, No. 35), p. 70. Abb. 12, Das Ost-tor. See also above, p. 205. [633] Messerschmidt, _C.I.H._, Pl. XXIX., No. 17. [634] Taken by Perrot for part of a sphinx, and by Macridy Bey for the lower part of a standing upright figure (_op. cit._, p. 25). [635] No. 16 in M. Perrot’s Plan, _op. cit._, fig. 324 (Pl. LV.). [636] We do not agree with any of the suggested restorations of these motives. Cf. Macridy Bey, _op. cit._, pp. 27, 28; Chantre, _Mission en Cappadoce_ (Paris, 1898), p. 9. [637] Von Luschan and others: _Mitteilungen aus den Orientalistischen Sammlungen_, Hefte xi., xii., and xiii.; _Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, i., ii., iii. (Berlin, 1893, 1898, 1907). [638] Published under the same auspices. _Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, iv. [639] See the Map on p. 375. [640] Not much can be inferred from this fact, inasmuch as the Hittite palaces even of the Aramæan phase were probably based upon earlier models and of much the same plan. There are references to the _Hilâni_ in the time of Sargon. [641] Compare the plan of the lower palace at Boghaz-Keui, p. 207. [642] Cf. _Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, iii. Pl. XXXIV. [643] Compare with the tail of sphinx of Sakje-Geuzi, Pl. LXXXI. [644] Cf. a sculpture from Sakje-Geuzi, Pl. LXXXI. (ii), and one from Marash, p. 115. So also the eagle-headed monster described above. [645] See above, pp. 203, 253, and Pl. LX., and plan, p. 247. [646] _Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, ii. p. 122 (Koldewey). [647] Corresponding in the main with the scheme of publication in _Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, iii. pp. 208-229, to the illustrations of which we refer in the footnotes. [648] Pp. 133, 134; Pl. XXXIX. and p. 105. [649] _Op. cit._, iii. Pl. XXXIX. [650] See Pl. LXXV. (ii), reproduced by courtesy of Dr. Messerschmidt. Cf. _Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, iii. Pl. XL. [651] As the band is in each case doubled, it does not seem probable that this is merely the detail of an upper part to the shoe. Cf. the monument of Ivrîz, Pl. LVII.