The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monumentsGarstang, John
History
The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monuments
Garstang, John
Hittites; Turkey -- Antiquities
The present volume aims at filling the gap which has already grown too
wide. It starts _ab initio_ with a rapid survey of the Hittite lands,
and an outline of their history. The Hittite monuments are then passed
in review, each described separately and independently, in such a way
as to be useful to any one visiting them _in situ_ or in the museums
of Constantinople and Berlin, where there are departments devoted
specially to this branch of archæology. The bibliography and numerous
cross-references in the footnotes will, it is hoped, make the work handy
to the archæologist as a book of reference. The author’s own theories
are mostly confined to the last chapter, and an effort has been made
to distinguish between facts proved or generally accepted and matters
of personal opinion. The attempt to reconstruct the history of the
fourteenth and thirteenth centuries B.C. from the archives recently
discovered by Dr. Winckler at Boghaz-Keui is put forward tentatively, and
would doubtless have been better done by a philologist. It has been found
impossible to treat the subject of Hittite art and religious symbolism in
general within the limited scope of this volume and its title.
Some other points are best noted at the outset. One aim of the book being
to interest the English reader in a fascinating but neglected subject,
the bibliographical references are given in English wherever translations
of foreign authors are available. Unhappily some of the masterpieces of
modern scholarship, like Meyer’s _Geschichte des Alterthums_, are not
yet rendered into English. The geographical names employed, even at the
risk of inconsistency, are those most familiar or in common use. Thus
Hamath instead of Hama, Aleppo for Haleb, Carchemish for Jerablus, Tyana
for Kilisse Hissar. In regard to the term ‘Hittite,’ also, the word is
primarily used in reference to that class of monuments generally known
as Hittite, and hence to the ancient people whose handiwork these were.
The word Hatti is used in a more restricted sense, to imply the central
and at one time dominant Hittite state or states whose seat and centre
of organisation was at Boghaz-Keui. But it should not be forgotten that
actually the words Hittite and Hatti are interchangeable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account