The last days of the French monarchyBelloc, Hilaire
History
The last days of the French monarchy
Belloc, Hilaire
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
What he spoke in his simple, good-natured, rather thick voice was, for
those who heard it, enormous. His first words raised the issue directly,
before men had well realized the shock--the royal authority was advising
a reversal of all that had been done in the six days:
“I thought, gentlemen, that I had done all in my power for the good of
my subjects.... The States General” [not the _National Assembly_] “have
been open now near two months, and they are not yet agreed upon the
preliminaries of their business.... It is my duty, it is a duty which I
owe to the common weal, and to my realm and to myself, to end these
divisions.... I come to repress whatever has been attempted against the
laws.”
He sat down, and every phrase in the five minutes or so of the
declaration drawn up for him had seemed to the Commons and their
partizans a challenge.
The king’s face, if witnesses may be trusted, showed some surprise.
There is an air in assemblies which can be felt, though not defined, and
the dense rows in black at the end of the hall were hostile.
Barentin came up the steps of the throne and knelt, as custom demanded,
then turned and said in a loud voice, “The king orders you to be
covered.”
Bailly put on his hat, sundry of his Commons followed his example. The
privileged orders for some reason made no such gesture. In the passions
of the moment it was thought that they deliberately insulted the third
order, as though not caring for the privilege of remaining covered
before the king, if the Commons were to share that privilege. At any
rate, Bailly nervously uncovered again, and those who had first followed
his example followed it once more. There was a little laughter, a little
subdued challenging. They ceased as the articles of the king’s main
declaration--Necker’s document--were read for him by his minister.
There were twenty-five of them; each was short, and their delivery no
great matter in time. But in effect they were capital. They maintained
the separation of the three orders. They broke the unity of the National
Assembly. They permitted common sessions only to debate questions which
were common to all three.
Louis spoke again for a moment. Next were read the thirty-five articles
Necker meant for a “liberal” constitution to the nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account