The last days of the French monarchyBelloc, Hilaire
History
The last days of the French monarchy
Belloc, Hilaire
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
“Go tell those that sent you we are here by the will of the nation.” He
added either that force alone (of bayonets or what-not) could drive the
Commons out, or, as some say, that such force was powerless.
Even as Mirabeau was speaking, Brézé, having had his answer from Bailly
the official head of the Commons, thus recalcitrant, moved away. The
custom of the court was on him, and he moved out backward with his white
wand. Of the men who saw that piece of ritual, some said within
themselves that the thing was a sign, and that sovereignty had passed
from the Bourbons.
When he had gone, there was silence again for a little while. It was
broken by the workmen setting to their labour of dismantling the hall.
Bailly ordered them to cease, and they obeyed the order.
The genius of the French people for decision and for manifold
co-operation appeared again and again throughout the Revolution, in
debate, in street fighting, upon the battle-field. Nowhere did it appear
more clearly than at this origin of all the movement.
[Illustration: EMANUEL JOSEPH SIEYES
_Député de la Ville de Paris à l’Assembleé Nationale en 1789 Elu
Président le 7 Juin 1790_
A Paru, chez l’AUTEUR, Quay des Augustins Nº. 71 an 3ᵉ.
EMMANUEL-JOSEPH SIEYÈS, DEPUTY FROM PARIS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY]
_To face p. 42_
Without traditional procedure, with no waiting on initiative from above,
immediate, spontaneous and collective action decided all.
One voice, proposing an adjournment until to-morrow, was voted down at
once. Next Sieyès, with his firm, accurate mouth, pronounced a graven
phrase expressing the mind of all: “You are to-day what you were
yesterday.” Immediately, upon the motion of Camus, a man too legal, but
well able to define, the Commons and such of the clergy as had remained
with them voted unanimously their contradiction to the throne. They
voted that all that they had passed, and all that they had done, they
still maintained.
As the hands which had been raised everywhere to vote this motion fell
again, the corner of French history was turned; and those curious to
choose a precise point at which the outset of any matter may be fixed,
should choose that moment, the fall of those hundreds of hands, for the
origin of modern Europe, its vast construction, its still imperilled
experiment.
One thing more remained to be done, though the general sense of those
present did not at first grasp its necessity; the proposal and the
carrying of it proceeded from the vivid sanity of Mirabeau. He it was
who proposed that they should vote the inviolability of themselves, the
deputies of the nation.
To pass that decree meant that _if_ the Assembly should win, it would
have, for the punishment of any that had attempted to defeat it by
force, the awful weapon which a solemn declaration of intention gives.
But it also meant that if the Commons were defeated, they had been
guilty of treason.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account