The last days of the French monarchyBelloc, Hilaire
History
The last days of the French monarchy
Belloc, Hilaire
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
The total forces at the disposal of the French crown--and it must be
remembered that the crown, not the parliament, was still master of the
armies--were, along the whole frontier from the Alps to the sea, a
trifle over 80,000 men. They were arranged in three armies. When war was
declared in the following April, all three, the army of the north, that
of the centre, and that of the Rhine, were each under the command of a
general who would certainly defend the monarchy against the
revolutionary spirit which had its centre in the populace of Paris.
The smallest army, that of the centre, a force of somewhat less than
20,000 men, was under the direct command of Lafayette, _but he was also
the chief of the three commanders_. At this moment therefore he is the
pivot upon which everything turns; nor is it possible to grasp the
nature of what follows save through an appreciation of how Lafayette
broke down.
Two-thirds of the regimental officers had emigrated, certain of the
cavalry regiments had crossed the frontier in a body; even the artillery
had suffered the loss of one-third of its commissioned ranks in this
fashion. The forces were not homogeneous, the numerous volunteers among
them were an element of weakness and disorder, the discipline was
deplorable and daily weakening. It was a general opinion throughout
Europe that the French line could not perform its task, and the first
weak attempts of the army of the north to invade the enemy’s territory
in what is now Belgium, and was then the Austrian Netherlands, resulted
in a miserable rout and a disgraceful and murderous mutiny. The Prussian
and the Austrian forces were slowly gathering for an invasion. That the
crown, still in command of those ill-equipped regiments and guns,
desired the success of the invasion was morally certain to the populace
of Paris; and the populace of Paris was right.
The king was manifestly party to a moral compact with the enemy, his
chief city was already holding him answerable for treason, when, in
June, long before the invading army had reached the frontier, but when
the terror of it was already rising high in the masses of the capital,
Lafayette moved. His move was in favour of the king.
His army was the smallest of the three, but the best provided; what was
more important in the temper of that moment, it was really attached to
its chief; for though Lafayette was prepared to defend the king against
Paris, yet the king had a traditional value in the soldiers’ eyes which
Paris had not gained, and they knew that, in the midst of much intrigue
the general’s character had nothing in it at all of intrigue; he was
known and still approved by his soldiery. Lastly, and most important, he
was, as we have seen, superior over the other generals in command.
In reply to the growing menace of the populace in Paris the king
dismissed his liberal ministers. The parliament declared that they
carried with them the regrets of the nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account