Ovid begins the poem by expressing his pleasure at receiving, at last, a
letter from Suillius, saying he hopes that Suillius does not feel
ashamed of being related to him by marriage (1-20). He then asks him to
address Germanicus on his behalf (21-26). In 27-30 he says how grateful
he will be if Germanicus assists him; at 31 he begins to address
Germanicus directly in a tripartite defence of poetry. The first part
(31-42) builds on 34 'Naso suis opibus, _carmine_, gratus erit': Ovid is
now poor, but can still offer Germanicus his poetry. The second section
(43-66) builds on 43-44 'nec tamen officio uatum per _carmina_ facto /
principibus res est aptior ulla uiris', and explains how verse brings
immortality to great men and their deeds. The third section (67-78)
offers culminating evidence for the value of poetry: Germanicus is
himself a poet. Ovid moves from this to a final plea that Germanicus
help his fellow-poet: once removed from Tomis, he will praise him in
verse (79-88). In the final distich of the poem, he asks Suillius to
assist his prayer.
The structure of the poem is similar to that of _Tr_ V ii. In that poem
Ovid addresses his wife for the first thirty-eight lines, telling her
of his misery and asking her to approach Augustus on his behalf. In the
six lines that follow, he asks himself what he will do if she fails him;
he answers that he will make his own direct approach to Augustus. The
final thirty-four lines are his prayer to Augustus, in which he
describes the hardships he endures at Tomis and begs for a mitigation of
his punishment. It is remarkable that in both poems direct addresses to
members of the imperial family should be disguised in this way: it seems
probable that _Tr_ II, Ovid's long defence of his conduct, had been
received by Augustus with hostility, and that he was thenceforth more
circumspect.
=1-2. SERA QVIDEM ... GRATA TAMEN.= _Tamen_ goes with _grata_, balancing
_quidem_. For instances of the separate _serus tamen_ idiom ('it is late
in happening, but it does in fact happen') see Nisbet and Hubbard at Hor
_Carm_ I xv 19.
=1. SERA QVIDEM.= It seems that in spite of his being a close relative of
Ovid, Suillius, like Sextus Pompeius (see the introduction to i), had
been reluctant to be openly associated with him.
=1. STVDIIS EXCVLTE.= 'Refined'. _Studiis_ adds little to the force of
_exculte_: the same idiom at Quintilian XII ii 1 'mores ante omnia
oratori _studiis_ erunt _excolendi_' and Cic _Tusc_ I 4 'ergo in Graecia
musici floruerunt, discebantque id omnes, nec qui nesciebat satis
_excultus doctrina_ putabatur'.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account