=13. CALYPSO= _BCMILT_. Lenz and André print CALYPSON (_FH_). Roman poets
followed the Greek declension of feminine proper nouns ending in
[Greek:-ô]; compare _Pan Mess_ 77 'fecunda Atlantidos arua _Calypsus_
[_uar_ calipsos]'. The accusatives of such nouns are of the same form as
the nominative. See for example _Aen_ IV 383-84 'et nomine _Dido_ /
saepe uocaturum' and _Aen_ VII 324-25 'luctificam _Allecto_ dirarum ab
sede dearum / infernisque ciet tenebris', cited by Charisius 63 (Keil);
neither he nor Servius shows knowledge of an accusative in _-on_.
Scribes, however, found the declension puzzling; and it is common to
find the pseudo-accusative in _-on_ offered by some manuscripts whenever
the true form in _-o_ occurs; this has happened at _Her_ VI 65 'ultimus
e sociis sacram conscendis in _Argo_', _Her_ VII 7 'certus es ire tamen
miseramque relinquere _Dido_ [_edd_: Didon _codd_]', _Her_ XII 9 'cur
umquam Colchi Magnetida uidimus _Argo_', _Am_ II ii 45 'dum nimium
seruat custos Iunonius _Io_', _Am_ II xix 29 'dum seruat Iuno mutatam
cornibus _Io_', and Prop I xx 17-18 'namque ferunt olim Pagasae
naualibus _Argo_ [_edd_: Argon _codd_] / egressam longe Phasidos isse
uiam'. Modern editors often print the spurious form, even at _AA_ I 323
'et modo se Europen fieri, modo postulat _Io_', where all manuscripts
offer the correct reading.
For a full discussion of this and the inverse corruption (for instance
of _Iason_ to _Iaso_), see Goold 12-14.
=14. AEQVOREAEQVE.= Compare _Am_ II xvii 17-18 'creditur _aequoream_ Pthio
Nereida regi, / Egeriam iusto concubuisse Numae' and _AA_ II 123-24 'non
formosus erat, sed erat facundus Vlixes, / et tamen _aequoreas_ torsit
amore deas'. Merkel's AEAEAEQVE is ingenious but unnecessary.
=15. HIPPOTADES= = _Aeolus_. The same patronymic at _Met_ IV 663, XI 431,
XIV 86, XIV 224 & XV 707.
=15. QVI DAT PRO MVNERE VENTOS.= Compare _Met_ XIV 223-26 'Aeolon ille
refert Tusco regnare profundo, / Aeolon Hippotaden, cohibentem carcere
_uentos_; / quos bouis inclusos tergo, _memorabile munus_, / Dulichium
sumpsisse ducem' and _Od_ X 19-26.
=17. NEC BENE CANTANTES LABOR EST AVDISSE PVELLAS.= The description is
intentionally prosaic. For the Homeric account of the Sirens see _Od_
XII 37-54 & 153-200.
=17. AVDISSE= _F_ AVDIRE _BCMHILT_. _Audire_ cannot stand, as the present
tense conflicts with _fuit_ in the following line. For _est audisse_
representing _fuit audire_, compare _Met_ IX 5-6 (Achelous hesitates
before recounting his wrestling-match with Hercules) 'referam tamen
ordine: nec tam / turpe _fuit uinci_ quam _contendisse decorum est_'.
=18. NEC DEGVSTANTI LOTOS AMARA FVIT.= See _Od_ IX 82-104 for Homer's
account of the Lotus-eaters.
=18. NEC ... AMARA= = _et dulcis_. Compare _Od_ IX 94 '[Greek: lôtoio
... meliêdea karpon]'.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account