I have from time to time cited from earlier editions readings of
manuscripts which I have not collated. To make it clear that I have not
personally verified these readings, I have added in parentheses after
the citation the name of the editor whose report I am using. Professor
R. J. Tarrant has inspected some nine manuscripts to see what readings
they offered in some particularly vexed portions of the poems; I have
similarly indicated when I am obliged to him for information on a
manuscript.
The _excerpta Scaligeri_ mentioned at xiii 27 I know of through
Heinsius' notes as printed in Burman's edition; according to M. D. Reeve
(_RhM_ CXVII [1974] 163), the original excerpts are still extant in Diez
8° 2560, a copy of the _editio Gryphiana_ of 1546. Reeve also gives
identifications of certain of Heinsius' manuscripts; when citing
Heinsius' codices, I give the modern name when the manuscript has been
identified and is still extant.
The greater number of the manuscripts dealt with have been corrected,
some heavily. In my apparatus _B1_ means "the original hand in _B_" and
_B2_ means "a correcting hand in B". _B2ul_ indicates that the reading
of _B2_ is clearly marked as a variant reading. _B2gl_ indicates that
the entry is marked in the manuscript as a gloss; _B2(gl)_ indicates a
gloss not marked as such. I have reported glosses where they contribute
to the understanding of a textual problem.
If different correctors have been at work in different passages, both
are called _B2_. If a later hand has made a correction after _B2_, the
later hand is called _B3_. When I place _B1_ in an entry but do not
report _B2_, it can be assumed that _B2_ has the lemma as its reading.
Sometimes a corrector has altered the original text so much (without
however erasing it entirely) that only the altered reading can be made
out. In such cases I have used the siglum _B2c_. Where a corrector has
inserted or altered only certain letters of a word, I have indicated
this in the HTML version of this edition by underlining the letters
involved. In the Text version, these letters are capitalized.
Where the correction is apparently by the original scribe, _Bac_
indicates the original reading, and _Bpc_ the correction.
The asterisk is used to indicate illegible letters, and the solidus (/)
erasures.
When reporting variants, I have tried to indicate the spellings actually
found in the manuscripts, but since mediaeval spellings do not in
themselves constitute variant readings, they have not usually been
reported when the text is not otherwise disturbed. I have been more
generous with proper names, but have often excluded confusions of
_ae_, _oe_, and _e_, of _i_ and _y_, of _ph_ and _f_, of _c_ and _t_,
the doubling of consonants, and the loss or addition of the aspirate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account