The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
The last day of the trial had now arrived, and M. le Procureur Dauphin
rose in his magnificent robe of red woollen, faced with black silk and
white fur, to address the jury. His tactics were somewhat different from
those of M. Cléry; he at once dropped the _entourage_ as hopelessly
corrupt and dishonest, and held up M. Roustan as the _one_ righteous man
in Tunis. The Musallis came off second-best at the hands of M. Dauphin,
but a diversion was made in favour of Mustapha, who was described in
touching language as “donnant à son souverain le jour et la nuit le
témoignage de son attachement.” After pooh-poohing the evidence adduced
by M. Rochefort, the Procureur-Général concluded his speech with these
words:—“If M. Roustan is guilty, by all means acquit M. Rochefort! The
day when M. Roustan will be in his turn placed at the bar, I shall know
how to do my duty, and I shall fulfil it with all the more assiduity as
the charge will concern an official. But if M. Roustan has been the
victim of calumny, I conjure you to defend him by your verdict, and in
saving the honour of an individual, you will at the same time protect
the fair fame of an entire country.”
Before M. Gatineau commenced his reply, M. Desfossés was recalled, and
another incident occurred. The witness was asked if he had been M.
Roustan’s intermediary for the distribution of Tunisian decorations at
Paris? He answered evasively, “It is possible,” adding in the same
breath, “I know nothing about it.” Being pressed still further, he
accused M. Delattré, one of the counsel for the defence, of having asked
for a _nichán_ himself. M. Delattré made a crushing rejoinder, and M.
Gatineau commenced a vigorous speech on behalf of M. Rochefort. After he
had finished his reply, a letter which had arrived that morning from
Tunis was admitted as evidence. Its author was M. Pelletier, a man of
considerable ability, who has for many years acted as a legal
practitioner in that city. After giving an account of the past doings of
the Musallis, he spoke of an affair which had lately happened as an
illustration of what was going on. “A man named El Mennai came to Tunis
as a candidate for the Khalifat of Gafsa. He at once opened negotiations
with Shatruk, a broker in the employ of Madame Musalli, and was promised
the place for 30,000 francs. A portion was to be paid at once, and the
remainder on his receiving the appointment. The first dragoman of the
French Consulate was at once sent to ask for the nomination, but the
Minister insisted on referring the matter to General Mourabet, the
Governor of Kairwán. An unfavourable report having been received, the
Minister endeavoured to shelve the question. El Mennai now began to
clamour for the money he had paid, but he was quietly told to keep quiet
and bring the remainder. He did so, and the next day received his _amra_
as Khalifa of Gafsa. Who can say with truth that nobody profits by the
Protectorate?” A mysterious list of the Musalli _pots de vin_ was also
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account