The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
produced. One of the items consisted of a sum of 2500 francs, which was
represented as being carried on porters’ backs in silver five-franc
pieces to the Musallis’ palace—a palpable exaggeration which was much
commented on at the time. M. Roustan had hardly done protesting against
these _manœuvres de dernière heure_, when the jury retired to consider
their verdict. Judges in France are no longer required to sum up the
evidence, or do anything more than present a list of questions to guide
the jurors in their finding. In half-an-hour they returned and acquitted
M. Rochefort and Delpierre upon all the counts of the indictment, and
the court ordered the prosecutor to pay the costs of the suit. An hour
afterwards the Boulevards of Paris rung with the shrill cries of the
news-boys selling _la condamnation de Roustan_.
The news was at once telegraphed to Tunis, and I shall ever remember the
sensation it occasioned. For a moment even the 12th May was forgotten.
The excitement was the greater, because the intelligence was wholly
unexpected. The _Havas_ as usual had gently prepared us for a very
different result, and when the verdict was given, omitted to telegraph
it for a whole day. The Bey gave a handsome gratuity to the man who
brought him the tidings, and when the newspapers at length came, they
fetched fabulous prices. Translations of the trial in Arabic were at a
premium, and the satisfaction reached a culminating point when the
_Havas_ told us the Minister-Resident would be “promoted.” This,
however, was not to be. Although, according to the speech of the
Procureur-Général, the acquittal of M. Rochefort should have entailed
the criminal prosecution of M. Roustan; although M. Cléry said that an
adverse verdict would expose M. Roustan to the fate of being “shot like
a dog or a bandit at the foot of a wall;” and notwithstanding that
everybody connected with the case was perfectly well aware that the
result amounted to a distinct condemnation of the Tunisian expedition,
its causes, its authors, and its consequences, M. Gambetta resolved to
defy public opinion, and send M. Roustan back to his dominions. His will
was law; but five weeks later, the great Minister, whose incarnation
France had waited patiently for during one entire decade, sustained a
far more crushing defeat than that suffered by his predecessors. If M.
Ferry died of Tunis-on-the-brain, M. Gambetta expired from acute
Roustanophobia. The _procès_ Roustan-Rochefort had far more to do with
the Ministerial crisis than the _scrutin de liste_. French Governments
and French statesmen have often flown in the face of the _vox populi_,
but they have almost invariably had to rue the consequences.
· · · · · · · · · ·
The trial of Henri Rochefort dissipated every remaining illusion as to
the Tunisian expedition, and France realised at last the true nature of
the bitter experience she had purchased, at the cost of so much treasure
and so many priceless lives.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account