The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel According to S. MarkBurgon, John William
Religion
The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel According to S. Mark
Burgon, John William
Bible. Mark XVI, 9-20 -- Criticism, Textual
A familiar contraction, executed probably in vermillion [χ over αρ], ἀρ,
indicates the “beginning” (ἀρχή) of each lection: a corresponding
contraction (ε over τ, τε, τελ), indicates its “end” (τέλοσ.) Generally,
these rubrical directions, (for they are nothing else,) are inserted for
convenience into the body of the text,—from which the red pigment with
which they are almost invariably executed, effectually distinguishes them.
But all these particulars gradually disappear as recourse is had to older
and yet older MSS. The studious in such matters have noticed that even the
memorandums as to the “beginning” and the “end” of a lection are rare,
almost in proportion to the antiquity of a Codex. When they do occur in
the later uncials, they do not by any means always seem to have been the
work of the original scribe; neither has care been always taken to
indicate them in ink of a different colour. It will further be observed in
such MSS. that whereas the sign where the reader is to begin is
generally—(in order the better to attract his attention,)—inserted in _the
margin_ of the Codex, the note where he is to leave off, (in order the
more effectually to arrest his progress,) is as a rule introduced _into
the body of the text_.(415) In uncial MSS., however, all such symbols are
not only rare, but (what is much to be noted) they are exceedingly
irregular in their occurrence. Thus in Codex Γ, in the Bodleian Library,
(a recently acquired uncial MS. of the Gospels, written A.D. 844), there
occurs no indication of the “end” of a single lection in S. Luke’s Gospel,
until chap. xvi. 31 is reached; after which, the sign abounds. In Codex L,
the original notes of Ecclesiastical Lections occur at the following rare
and irregular intervals:—S. Mark ix. 2: x. 46: xii. 40 (where the sign has
lost its way; it should have stood against ver. 44): xv. 42 and xvi.
1.(416) In the _oldest_ uncials, nothing of the kind is discoverable. Even
in the Codex Bezæ, (vith century,) not a single liturgical direction
_coeval with the MS._ is anywhere to be found.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account