(xxx.) EVAN. 181 (Xavier, Cod. Zelada.) Birch was shewn this Codex of the Four Gospels in the Library of Cardinal Xavier of Zelada (_Prolegomena_, p. lviii): “Cujus forma est in folio, pp. 596. In margine passim occurrunt scholia ex Patrum Commentariis exscripta.” (xxxi.) EVAN. 186 (Laur. vi. 18.) This Codex is minutely described by Bandini (_Cat._ i. 130), who gives the Scholion (_infra_, p. 388-9), and says that the Commentary is without any Author’s name. (xxxii.) EVAN. 194 (Laur. vi. 33.) Βίκτορος πρεσβυτέρου Ἀντιοχείας ἑρμηνεία εἰς τὸ κατὰ Μάρκον εὐαγγέλιον. (See the description of this Codex in Bandini’s _Cat._ i. 158.) (xxxiii.) EVAN. 195 (Laur. vi. 34.) This Codex seems to correspond in its contents with No. xxxi. _suprà_: the Commentary containing the Scholion, and being anonymous. (See Bandini, p. 161.) (xxxiv.) EVAN. 197 (Laur. viii. 14.) The Commentary, (which is Victor’s, but has no Author’s name prefixed,) is defective at the end. (See Bandini, p. 355.) (xxxv.) EVAN. 210 (Venet. 27.) “Conveniunt initio Commentarii eum iis qui Victori Antiocheno tribuuntur, progressu autem discrepant.” (Theupoli _Graeca D. Marci Bibl. Codd. MSS._ Venet. 1740.) I infer that the work is anonymous. (xxxvi.) Venet. 495. “VICTORIS ANTIOCHENI Presbyteri expositio in Evangelium Marci, collecta ex diversis Patribus.” (I obtain this reference from the Catalogue of Theupolus.) (xxxvii.) EVAN. 215 (Venet. 544.) I presume, from the description in the Catalogue of Theupolus, that this Codex also contains a copy of Victor’s Commentary. (xxxviii.) EVAN. 221 (Vind. Ness. 117, Lambec. 38). Kollar has a long note (B) [iii. 157] on the Commentary, which has no Author’s name prefixed. Birch (p. 225) refers to it for the purpose recorded under No. xxv. (xxxix.) EVAN. 222 (Vind. Ness. 180, Lambec. 39.) The Commentary is anonymous. Birch refers to it, as before. Add the following six MSS. at Moscow, concerning which, see Matthaei’s Nov. Test. (1788) vol. ii. p. xii.:— (xl.) EVAN. 237 (This is Matthaei’s d or D [described in his _N. T._ ix. 242. Also _Vict. Ant._ ii. 137.] “SS. Synod. 42:”) and is one of the MSS. employed by Matthaei in his ed. of Victor.—The Commentary on S. Mark has no Author’s name prefixed. (xli.) EVAN. 238 (Matthaei’s e or E [described in his _N. T._ ix. 200. Also _Vict. Ant._ ii. 141.] “SS. Synod. 48.”) This Codex formed the basis of Matthaei’s ed. of Victor, [See the _Not. Codd. MSS._ at the end of vol. ii. p. 123. Also _N. T._ ix. 202.] The Commentary on S. Mark is anonymous. (xlii.) EVAN. 253 (Matthaei’s 10 [described in his _N. T._ ix. 234.] It was lent him by Archbishop Nicephorus.) Matthaei says (p. 236) that it corresponds with a (_our_ Evan. 259). No Author’s name is prefixed to the Commentary on S. Mark.