(xliii.) EVAN. 255 (Matthaei’s 12 [described in his _N. T._ ix. 222. Also _Vict. Ant._ ii. 133.]) “SS. Synod. 139.” The Scholia on S. Mark are here entitled ἐξηγητικαὶ ἐκλογαί, and (as in 14) are few in number. For some unexplained reason, in his edition of Victor of Antioch, Matthaei saw fit to designate this MS. as “B.” [N.T. ix. 224 _note_.] ... See by all means, _infrà_, the “Postscript.” (xliv.) EVAN. 256 (Matthaei’s 14 [described in his _N. T._ ix. 220.] “Bibl. Typ. Synod. 3.”) The Commentary on S. Mark is here assigned to VICTOR, presbyter of Antioch; but the Scholia are said to be (as in “12” [No. xxxix]) few in number. (xlv.) EVAN. 259 (Matthaei’s a or A [described in his _N. T._ ix. 237. Also _Vict. Ant._ ii. 128.] “SS. Synod. 45.”) This is one of the MSS. employed by Matthaei in his ed. of Victor. No Author’s name is prefixed to the Commentary. (xlvi.) EVAN. 332 (Taurin. xx _b_ iv. 20.) Victor’s Commentary is here given anonymously. (See the Catalogue of Pasinus, P. i. p. 91.) (xlvii.) EVAN. 353 (Ambros. M. 93): with the same Commentary as Evan. 181, (i.e. No. xxx.) (xlviii.) EVAN. 374 (Vat. 1445.) Written continuously in a very minute character. The Commentary is headed (in a later Greek hand) + ἑρμηνεία Πέτρου Λαοδικείας εἰς τοὺς δ᾽ αγ [ίους] εὐαγγελιστάς +. This is simply a mistake. No such work exists: and the Commentary on the second Evangelist is that of Victor. (See No. xxviii.) (xlix.) EVAN. 428 (Monacensis 381. Augsburg 11): said to be duplicate of Evan. 300 (i.e. of No. xiv.) (1.) EVAN. 432 (Monacensis 99.) The Commentary contained in this Codex is evidently assigned to VICTOR. (li.) EVAN. 7pe (ix. 3. 471.) A valuable copy of the Four Gospels, dated 1062; which Edw. de Muralto (in his Catalogue of the Greek MSS. in the Imperial Library at S. Petersburg) says contains the Commentary of VICTOR ANT. (See Scrivener’s _Introduction_, p. 178.). (lii.) At Toledo, in the “Biblioteca de la Iglesia Mayor,” Haenel [p. 885] mentions:—“VICTOR ANTIOCHENUS Comm. Graec. in iv. [?] Evangelia saec. xiv. membr. fol.” To this enumeration, (which could certainly be very extensively increased,) will probably have to be added the following:— EVAN. 146 (Palatino Vat. 5.) EVAN. 233 (Escurial [Upsilon]. ii. 8.) EVAN. 373 (Vat. 1423.) EVAN. 379 (Vat. 1769.) EVAN. 427 (Monacensis 465, Augsburg 10.) Middle Hill, No. 13,975,—a MS. in the collection of Sir Thomas Phillipps.