65 It does not sensibly detract from the value of this evidence that one ancient codex, the “Codex Bobbiensis” (k), which Tregelles describes as “a revised text, in which the influence of ancient MSS. is discernible,” [_Printed text_, &c. p. 170.] and which therefore may not be cited in the present controversy,—exhibits after ver. 8 a Latin translation of the spurious words which are also found in Cod. L. 66 “Quod Gothicum testimonium haud scio an critici satis agnoverint, vel pro dignitate aestimaverint.” Mai, _Nova Patt. Bibl._ iv. 256. _ 67 Account of the Printed Text_, p. 247. _ 68 Gr. Test._ p. 322. 69 Ἐν μὲν τοῖς ἀκριβεστέροις ἀντιγράφοις τὸ κατὰ Μάρκον εὺαγγέλιον μέχρι τοῦ ἐφοβοῦντο γὰρ, ἔχει τὸ τέλος. ἐν δέ τισι πρόσκειται καὶ ταῦτα ἀναστὰς δὲ πρωί πρώτῃ σαββάτων (sic) ἐφάνη πρῶτον Μαρίᾳ τῇ Μαγδαληνῇ ἀφ᾽ ἦς ἐκβεβλήκει ἑπτὰ δαιμόνια. _Opp._ (ed. 1638) iii, 411 B. 70 Tregelles, _Printed Text_, p. 248, also in Horne’s _Introd._ iv. 434-6. So Norton, Alford, Davidson, and the rest, following Wetstein, Griesbach, Scholz, &c. _ 71 Nov. Auct._ i. 743-74.—_Bibl. Vett. PP._ xi. 221-6. _ 72 Bibl. Coisl._ pp. 68-75.—_Catena_, i. 243-51. 73 Dionysius Syrus (i.e. the Monophysite Jacobus Bar-Salibi [see Dean Payne Smith’s _Cat. of Syrr. MSS._ p. 411] who died A.D. 1171) in his _Exposition of S. Mark’s Gospel_ (published at Dublin by Dudley Loftus, 1672, 4to.) seems (at p. 59) to give this homily to Severus.—I have really no independent opinion on the subject. 74 Alford, _Greek Test._ i. p. 433. _ 75 Scriptorum Vett. Nova Collectio_, 4to. vol. i. pp. 1-101. 76 At p. 217, (_ed._ 1847), Mai designates it as “Codex Vat. Palat. cxx pulcherrimus, sæculi ferme x.” At p. 268, he numbers it rightly,—ccxx. We are there informed that the work of Eusebius extends from fol. 61 to 96 of the Codex. 77 Vol. iv. pp. 219-309.