Justice, Administration of; Law -- Philosophy; Law and socialism; Property; Socialism and liberty
be too universal. Nobody is under any responsibility to society. The
will and the capacity to choose well are taken for granted. Can the
people be mistaken? Are we not living in an age of enlightenment?
What! Are the people to be forever led about by the nose? Have they not
acquired their rights at the cost of effort and sacrifice? Have they not
given sufficient proof of intelligence and wisdom? Are they not arrived
at maturity? Are they not in a state to judge for themselves? Do they
not know their own interest? Is there a man or a class who would dare
to claim the right of putting himself in the place of the people, of
deciding and of acting for them? No, no; the people would be free, and
they shall be so. They wish to conduct their own affairs, and they shall
do so.
But when once the legislator is duly elected, then indeed the style of
his speech alters. The nation is sent back into passiveness, inertness,
nothingness, and the legislator takes possession of omnipotence. It
is for him to invent, for him to direct, for him to impel, for him to
organize. Mankind has nothing to do but to submit; the hour of despotism
has struck. And we must observe that this is decisive; for the people,
just before so enlightened, so moral, so perfect, have no inclinations
at all, or, if they have any, these all lead them downwards towards
degradation. And yet they ought to have a little liberty! But are we not
assured by Mr. Considerant that liberty leads fatally to monopoly? Are
we not told that liberty is competition? and that competition, according
to Mr. Louis Blanc, is a system of extermination for the people, and of
ruination for trade? For that reason people are exterminated and ruined
in proportion as they are free--take, for example, Switzerland, Holland,
England, and the United States? Does not Mr. Louis Blanc tell us again
that competition
{45}
leads to monopoly, and that, for the same reason, cheapness leads
to exorbitant prices? That competition tends to drain the sources of
consumption, and diverts production to a destructive activity?
That competition forces production to increase, and consumption to
decrease--whence it follows that free people produce for the sake of not
consuming; that there is nothing but oppression and madness among them;
and that it is absolutely necessary for Mr. Louis Blanc to see to it?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account