The Law and Medical MenRogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
History
The Law and Medical Men
Rogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
Medical laws and legislation
[11] _Poucher_ v. _Norman_, 3 B. & C. 744; _Chorley_ v. _Bolcot_, 4 T.
R. 317; _Veitch_ v. _Russell_, 3 Q. B. 925.
[12] _Battersby_ v. _Lawrence_, Car. & M. 277.
[13] Per _Bramwell, B._; _Ellis_ v. _Kelly_, 6 H. & N. 226; _Allison_
v. _Haydon_, 3 C. & P. 246; _Apothecaries Co._ v. _Lotinga_, 2 Moo. &
R. 495: _Battersby_ v. _Lawrence_, Car. & M. 277.
[14] _Gensham_ v. _Germain_, 11 Moore 1; _Towne_ v. _Gresley_, 3 C. &
P. 581; _Handey_ v. _Henson_, 4 C. & P. 110; _Morgan_ v. _Hallen_, 8
Ad. & E. 489.
[15] Stair I. 12; 5.
[16] _Adams_ v. _Stevens_, 26 Wend. 451.
[17] 21 & 22 Vict. cap. 90, sec. 27; _Simpson_ v. _Dismore_, 9 M. & W.
47; R. S. Ont. cap, 142, secs, 35–36.
[18] _Hewitt_ v. _Wilcox_, 1 Met. 154.
[19] _Adams_ v. _Stevens_, 26 Wend. 451; _Baxter_ v. _Gray_, 4 Scott,
N. R. 374; _Mock_ v. _Kelly_, 3 Ala. 387; _Beekman_ v. _Planter_, 15
Barb. 550; _McPherson_ v. _Chedell_, 24 Wend. 15; _Simmons_ v. _Means_,
8 Sm. & Marsh, 397; _Smith_ v. _Watson_, 14 Vt. 322.
[20] Ordronaux, sec. 39; Willcocks on the Medical Profession, p. 111.
[21] _Tuson_ v. _Batting_, 3 Esp. N. P. 192; _Baxter_ v. _Gray_, 4
Scott, N. R. 374.
[22] Affaire Tallien Jour. du Palais, vol. 3; An. XI., XII. p. 210.
[23] _Collins_ v. _Grady_, 13 Louis. An. 95; 2 Louis. 331.
[24] _People_ v. _Monroe_, 4 Wend. 200; _Blogg_ v. _Parkers_, Ry. & M.
N. P. C. 125.
[25] Story on Bailments, sec. 375.
[26] _Farnsworth_ v. _Garrard_, 1 Camp. 38; _Adler_ v. _Buckley_, 1
Swan (Tenn.) 69; _Gallagher_ v. _Thompson_, Wright (Ohio), 466.
[27] _Basten_ v. _Butter_, 7 East, 479.
[28] _Adler_ v. _Buckley_, 1 Swan (Tenn.), 69.
[29] _Hill_ v. _Featherstonhaugh_, 7 Bing. 574; _Seare_ v. _Prentise_,
8 East, 350.
[30] _Duffit_ v. _James_, cited _Baston_ v. _Butter_, 7 East, 480;
_Kannen_ v. _McMullen_, 1 Peake, 85; _Bellinger_ v. _Craigue_, 31 Barb.
534; _Long_ v. _Morrison_, 14 Ind. 595.
[31] _Kannen_ v. _McMullen_, 1 Peake, 83; _Hupe_ v. _Phelps_, 2
Starkie, 424.
[32] _Piper_ v. _Menifee_, 12 B. Monr. 467.
[33] Ordronaux p. 92.
[34] _Landon_ v. _Humphrey_, 9 Conn. 209.
[35] Peake’s N. P. C. 83, 84.
[36] _Hughes_ v. _Hampton_, Const. Rep. (S. C.) 745.
[37] _Wheeler_ v. _Sims_, 5 Jur. 151; _Newton_ v. _Ker_, 14 Louis. An.
704.
[38] _Tuson_ v. _Batting_, 3 Esp. 191.
[39] _Miller_ v. _Beal_, 26 Ind. 234.
[40] _Collins_ v. _Graves_, 13 Louis. An. 95; _Villalobas_ v. _Mooney_,
2 Louis. 331.
[41] _Todd_ v. _Myers_, 40 Cal. 357.
[42] _Succession of Duclos_, 11 Louis. An. 406; _Sheldon_ v. _Johnson_,
40 Ia. 84; _Guerard_ v. _Jenkins_, 1 Strobh. 171; Ordronaux, sec. 47.
[43] _Roberts_ v. _Kerfoot_, cited Glenn’s Laws, p. 201; _Stackman_ v.
_Vivian_, 34 Beav. 290.
[44] Ordronaux, sec. 43.
[45] _Bassett_ v. _Spofford_, 11 N. H. 167.
[46] _Smith_ v. _Hyde_, 19 Verm. 54; _Mock_ v. _Kelly_, 3 Alab. 387;
Jones on Bailm. 99; Ordronaux, secs. 21 and 15.
[47] _McClallen_ v. _Adams_, 19 Pick, 333; Ordronaux, sec. 48.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account