The Law and Medical MenRogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
History
The Law and Medical Men
Rogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
Medical laws and legislation
[48] _Parkinson_ v. _Atkinson_, 31 L. J., C. P. 199; _Turner_ v.
_Turner_, 5 Jur., N. S., 839.
[49] _Clark_ v. _Gill_, 1 Kay & J. 19; _Webb_ v. _Paige_, 1 Car. & Kir.
23.
[50] _Hammond_ v. _Stewart_, 1 Stra. 510.
[51] _In re Askin & Charteris_, 13 U. C. R. 498.
[52] _In re Harbottle & Wilson_, 30 U. C. R. 314.
[53] R. S. O. cap. 79, sec. 10.
[54] Iowa Code, 1873, sec. 1814; North Carolina Laws, 1871, cap. 139,
sec. 13; Rhode Is. Pub. Stat. 1882, p. 733; Indiana Rev. Stat. 1881, p.
94, sec. 504.
[55] _Belts_ v. _Clifford_, Warwick Assizes, Lent, 1858.
[56] _Webb_ v. _Paige_, 1 Car. & Ker. 23.
[57] _Buchman_ v. _State_, 59 Ind. 1.
[58] In _Re Roelker_. 1 Sprague, 276.
[59] _People_ v. _Montgomery_, 13 Abb. Pr. (N. S.), 207.
[60] Juris. of Med. secs. 114–116; 1 Tay. Med. Jur. p. 19; 2 Phil. Ev.
4th Am. Ed., p. 828; 1 Redf. on Wills, pp. 154–155.
[61] Exparte _Dement_, 53 Ala. 389.
[62] _Summer_ v. _State_, 5 Tex. Ct. of App. 574.
[63] Smith on Contracts, 85.
[64] _Bradley_ v. _Dodge_, 45 How., N. Y., Pr. 57; _Craine_ v.
_Bandoine_, 65 Barb., N. Y., 261; _Harrison_ v. _Grady_, 13 L. T., N.
S., 369; _Spaun_ v. _Mercer_, 8 Neb., 537.
[65] _Watling_ v. _Walters_, 1 C. & P. 132.
[66] _Boyd_ v. _Sappington_, 6 Watts, 247.
[67] _Smith_ v. _Watson_, 14 Vt. 332.
[68] _Harrison_ v. _Grady_, 13 L. T., N. S. 369; _Cooper_ v. _Lloyd_, 6
C. B., N. S. 519; Roper on Husband and Wife, 2nd ed. v. ii. p. 114.
[69] _Harrison_ v. _Grady_, supra; _Thorpe_ v. _Shapleigh_, 67 Me. 235.
[70] _Webber_ v. _Spaunpake_, 2 Redf., N. Y., 258.
[71] _Berier_ v. _Galloway_, 71 Ill. 517; _Hartmann_ v. _Tegart_, 12
Kan. 177.
[72] _Potter_ v. _Virgil_, 67 Barb. N. Y., 578.
[73] _Wood_ v. _O’Kelley_, 8 Cush. 406.
[74] Parsons on Contracts, vol. i. p. 302–303; _Blackburn_ v. _Mackey_,
1 C. & P. 1.
[75] _Crantz_ v. _Gill_, 2 Esp. 471.
[76] _Rogers_ v. _Turner_, 59 Mo. 116; _Deane_ v. _Annis_, 14 Me. 26;
_Swain_ v. _Tyler_, 26 Vt. 1.
[77] _Cooper_ v. _Phillips_, 4 C. & P. 581.
[78] 31 & 32 Vict. cap. 122, sec. 37.
[79] _Reg._ v. _Downes_, 1 Q. B. D. 25.
[80] _Reg._ v. _Hines_, 80 Cen. C. C. Sess. Pap. 309; _Reg._ v.
_Wagstaffe_, 10 Cox. C. C. 530.
[81] _Reg._ v. _Morby_, 8 Q. B. D. 571.
[82] _Blackburn_ v. _Mackey_, 1 C. & P. 1; _Hoyt_ v. _Casey_, 14 Mass.
397.
[83] _Wennall_ v. _Adney_, 3 B. & P. 24; _Sellen_ v. _Norman_, 4 C. &
P. 80.
[84] _Cooper_ v. _Phillips_, 4 C. & P. 581.
[85] _R._ v. _Smith_, 8 C. & P. 153.
[86] Glenn’s Law of Medical Men, pp. 197–199.
[87] _Cox_ v. _Midland Counties Railway_, 3 Ex. 268; _Cooper_ v. _N. Y.
C._ 13 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 276.
[88] _Walker_ v. _Great Western Railway_, 2 L. R. Ex. 228; _Cairo,
etc., Railroad Company_ v. _Mahoney_, 82 Ill. 73; _Stephenson_ v. _N.
Y. & H. R. R. Co._, 2 Duer. 341.
[89] Per Parke, B., and Rolfe, B., in _Cox_ v. _Mid. Co. Railway_,
supra.
[90] _Corsi_ v. _Maretzck_, 4 E. D. Smith 1 (1855).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account