The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on HistoryAdams, Brooks
Philosophy
The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on History
Adams, Brooks
Civilization -- History; Degeneration; History -- Philosophy
“Of how great laud and praise this man was worthy, and what
courage and stoutness was in him, it may hereby evidently
appear unto all men, that he alone, through the singular
dexterity of his wit and counsel, brought to pass that, which,
even unto this day no prince or king, throughout all Europe,
dare or can bring to pass. For whereas Brittania alone, of all
other nations, is and hath been, of her own proper nature,
most superstitious; this Cromwell, being born of a common
or base stock, through a divine method or policy of wit and
reason received, suffered, deluded, brake off, and repressed,
all the policies, trains, malice, and hatred of friars, monks,
religious men, and priests, of which sort there was a great
rabble in England.”[245]
Cromwell’s strength lay in his superiority to those scruples of
truth and honour which hamper feebler men. He did what circumstances
demanded. His object, like Philip’s, was to blacken his victims
that he might destroy them, and, to gather the evidence, he chose
instruments adapted to the work. To have used others would have
demonstrated himself unfit. Mr. Gairdner has remarked in his preface
to the tenth volume of the _Calendar_: “We have no reason indeed to
think highly of the character of Cromwell’s visitors.”[246] This
opinion of Mr. Gairdner is supported by all the evidence extant.
Thomas Legh, one of the commissioners, not only always took bribes,
but, having been appointed master of Sherburn Hospital, administered
it “to the utter disinheritance, decay and destruction of the ancient
and godly foundation of the same house.”[247] Henry probably thought
him dishonest, since he had his accounts investigated. Even Legh’s
colleague, Ap Rice, though venal himself, and in great fear of being
murdered for his treachery, denounced him in set terms to Cromwell:--
“And surely he asketh no less for every election than £20 as of
duty, which in my opinion is too much, and above any duty that
was ever taken heretofore. Also in his visitations he refuseth
many times his reward, though it be competent, for that they
offer him so little and maketh them to send after him such
rewards as may please him, for surely religious men were never
afraid so much of Dr. Allen as they be of him, he useth such
rough fashion with them.”[248]
The next day, however, Ap Rice, in alarm lest his frankness might lead
to his assassination, wrote to beg his master to be cautious:--
“Forasmuch as the said Mr. Doctor is of such acquaintance and
familiarity with many rufflers and serving men, ... I having
commonly no great assistance with me when I go abroad, might
take perchance irrevocable harm of him or his ere I were aware.
Please keep secret what I have said.”[249]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account