The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on HistoryAdams, Brooks
Philosophy
The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on History
Adams, Brooks
Civilization -- History; Degeneration; History -- Philosophy
“You had nothing against the Greeks, and you were false to
your vows because you did not fight the Saracens, but the
Christians; you did not capture Jerusalem, but Constantinople;
you preferred earthly to heavenly treasures. But what was far
graver, you have spared neither religion, nor age, nor sex, and
you have committed adulteries, fornications and incests before
men’s eyes.... Nor did the imperial treasures suffice you, nor
the plunder alike of rich and poor. You laid your hands on the
possessions of the Church, you tore the silver panels from
the altars, you broke into the sanctuaries and carried away
the images, the crosses and the relics, so that the Greeks,
though afflicted by persecution, scorn to render obedience
to the apostolic chair, since they see in the Latins nothing
but an example of perdition and of the works of darkness, and
therefore rightly abhor them more than dogs.”[142]
For the north and west of Europe the crusade of Constantinople seems to
have been the turning point whence the imagination rapidly declined.
At the opening of the thirteenth century, everything shows that the
genuine ecstatic type predominated in the Church--the quality of mind
which believed in the miracle, and therefore valued the amulet more
than money. Innocent himself, with all his apparent worldliness, must
have been such a man; for, though the material advantages of a union
with the Greek Church far outweighed the Sepulchre, his resistance to
the diversion of the army from Palestine was unshaken to the last. The
same feeling permeated the inferior clergy; and an anecdote told by
Gunther shows that even so late as the year 1204 the monks unaffectedly
despised wealth in its vulgar form.
“When therefore the victors set themselves with alacrity
to spoil the conquered town, which was theirs by right of
war, the abbot Martin began to think about his share of the
plunder; and lest, when everything had been given to others,
he should be left empty-handed, he proposed to stretch out his
consecrated hand to the booty. But since he thought the taking
of secular things unworthy, he bestirred himself to obtain a
portion of the sacred relics, which he knew were there in great
quantities.”[143]
The idea was no sooner conceived than executed. Although private
marauding was punished with death, he did not hesitate, but hastened
to a church, where he found a frightened old monk upon his knees, whom
he commanded in a terrible voice to produce his relics or prepare for
death. He was shown a chest full to the brim. Plunging in his arms, he
took all he could carry, hurried to his ship and hid his booty in his
cabin; and he did this in a town whose streets were literally flowing
with gold and silver. He had his reward. Though a sacrilegious thief,
angels guarded him by sea and land until he reached his cloister at
Bâle. Then he distributed his plunder through the diocese.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account