The Laws of War, Affecting Commerce and Shipping — John Shaqi
The Laws of War, Affecting Commerce and ShippingThomson, H. Byerley (Henry Byerley)
History
The Laws of War, Affecting Commerce and Shipping
Thomson, H. Byerley (Henry Byerley)
Maritime law; War (International law); War, Maritime (International law)
Without entering on the long arguments that have been produced on this
subject, and which it is not the intention of this treatise to
reproduce, the rule may be stated very nearly as follows.[9]
That though, on principle, the property of the enemy is liable to
seizure and confiscation, yet it is now an established international
usage that such property found within the territory of the belligerent
state, or debts due to its subjects by the government or individuals,
_at the commencement_ of hostilities, are not liable to be seized and
confiscated as prize of war.
This rule is often enforced by treaty, but unless thus enforced it
cannot be considered as an inflexible, though established, rule. This
rule is a guide which the Sovran of the belligerent state follows or
abandons at will, and although it cannot be disregarded by him without
obloquy, yet it may be disregarded. It is not an immutable rule, but
depends on considerations which continually vary.[10]
[Sidenote: Rule with respect to Immoveable Property.]
The rule is different with respect to Immoveable Things, such as
Landed Estates. He who declares war does not confiscate the Immoveable
Estate possessed in his country by the enemy, but the Income may be
sequestrated, to prevent its being remitted to the enemy.[11]
[Sidenote: Public Funds.]
Public Funds, or in other words, debts due from the Sovran of the
hostile state to Private Persons, are always held protected from
confiscation, and there is only one instance in modern times where
this rule has been broken. It is a matter of public faith; and even
during war, no enquiry ought to be made whether any part of the public
debt is due to the subjects of the enemy.[12]
[Sidenote: Rule of Reciprocity.]
All these rules are, however, subject to the Rule of Reciprocity. This
is thus laid down by Sir William Scott, in the case of the Santa Cruz,
"that at the commencement of a war, it is the constant
practice of this country to condemn property seized before
the war, if the enemy condemns, and to restore if the enemy
restores. It is a principle sanctioned by that great
foundation of the Law of England, _Magna Charta_ itself,
which prescribes, that at the commencement of a war the
enemy's merchants shall be kept and treated as our own
merchants are treated in their country."[13]
[Sidenote: Droits of Admiralty.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account