Such a rapid, wholesale moult as in the case of the geese would be
fatal to land birds. Instead, their primaries, or large wing feathers,
drop out one or two at a time and symmetrically from the two wings.
Oftentimes it is the two inner primaries that go first, then the others
following one at a time, the outermost last. This order varies, as in
the kingfisher. In the snow bunting all but two of the old primaries
are gone before any new ones have grown as large as the secondaries. In
the hawks, again, birds that must use their wings and must have them
always at their best, the moulting of the wing feathers is very slow,
lasting nearly the whole year. The homing pigeon, another great flier,
but not of the same kind as the hawks, begins about May to moult his
wing feathers, losing the tenth primary first, a month later the ninth,
then the others at intervals of from eight to fifteen days.
It is quite enough to make one pause, to make one even wonder, when he
finds that this seemingly insignificant matter is taken so seriously by
nature, and that even here there is that perfect adaptation of means
to end. The gosling, to cite another instance, goes six weeks in down,
then gets its first feathers, which it sheds in the fall. The young
quail, on the other hand, is born with quills so far advanced that
it is able to fly almost as soon as it is hatched. These are mature
feathers; but the bird is still young and growing, and soon outgrows
these first flight feathers, so that they are quickly lost and new
ones come. This goes on till fall, several moults occurring the first
summer to meet the increasing weight of the growing body.
Where there are peculiar uses made of the tail, as with the chimney
swifts and woodpeckers, there is a peculiar order of moulting. In most
birds the tail is a kind of balance or steering-gear, and not of equal
importance with the wings. Nature, consequently, seems to have attached
less importance to the feathers of the tail. They are not so firmly
set, and they are hardly of the same quality or kind; for if a wing
feather is once broken or lost, after the moult, it must go unmended
until the annual moulting time comes round again; whereas, if a tail
feather is lost through accident, it is made good, no matter when.
How do you explain that? I know that old theory of the birds roosting
with their tails out, and so, through generations of lost tails, those
feathers now grow, expecting to be plucked by some enemy, and so have
only a temporary hold. Perhaps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account