Detective and mystery stories; Sheringham, Roger (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
“And Lady Stanworth, then. Well, dash it all, you can’t expect them to
take us into their confidence, can you? And that is the only way in
which their part can be cleared up. Not that it seems to me in the
least worth clearing up. I don’t see that it could possibly have
anything to do with the murder. Good Lord, it’s practically the same
thing as accusing them of the murder itself! I ask you, my dear chap,
_can_ you imagine either Mrs. Plant or Lady Stanworth—we’ll leave
Jefferson out for the moment—actually plotting old Stanworth’s murder!
It’s really too ludicrous. You ought to have more sense.”
“This particular topic always seems to excite you, Alexander,”
observed Roger mildly.
“Well, I mean, it’s so dashed absurd. You can’t really believe
anything of the sort.”
“Perhaps I don’t. Anyhow, we’ll shelve it till something more definite
crops up. It’s quite hot enough already, without making each other
still more heated. Look here, let’s give the whole thing a rest till
we get back. It will clear our brains. I’ll give you a short lecture
on the influence of the Platonic ethics on Hegelian philosophy
instead, with a few sidelights on neo-Platonism.” Which, in spite of
Alec’s spirited protests, he at once proceeded to do.
In this way the time passed pleasantly and instructively till they had
passed the lodge gates once more.
“So you see,” concluded Roger happily, “that while in mediæval
philosophy this mysticism is in powerful and ultimately successful
opposition to rationalistic dogmatism, with its contemptuous disregard
for all experience, the embryonic science of the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries was actually in itself a logical development of
neo-Platonism in this same opposition to barren rationalism.”
“Was it?” said Alec gloomily, registering a secret but none the less
fervent prayer that he might never hear the word neo-Platonism again
as long as he lived. “I see.”
“You do? Good. Then let us seek out and have speech with friend
William.”
“Are you going to give him a short lecture on rationalistic
dogmatism?” Alec asked carefully. “Because if so, I’m going indoors.”
“I’m afraid it would be wasted on William,” Roger replied seriously.
“William, I feel sure, is a dogmatist of the most bigoted type if ever
there was one; and to lecture to him on the futility of dogma would be
as ineffective as to harangue a hippopotamus on the subject of
drawing-room etiquette. No, I just want to sound William a little. Not
that I think it will really be of much help to us, but just at present
I’m turning every stone I can see.”
In due course William was run to earth in a large greenhouse. He was
mounted unhappily on an exceedingly rickety pair of steps and engaged
in tying up a vine. On seeing Roger he hastily descended to firm
ground. William did not believe in taking chances.
“Good-afternoon, William,” said Roger brightly.
“Arternoon, sir,” William responded suspiciously.
“I’ve just been having a chat with your wife, William.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account