The Learned Lady in England, 1650-1760Reynolds, Myra
History
The Learned Lady in England, 1650-1760
Reynolds, Myra
Women -- Education -- Great Britain; Women -- Great Britain; Women authors, English
But if she were the author she has hidden the fact so successfully
as to lose the credit of her work. Modern investigation ascribes the
series of books, _The Whole Duty of Man_, _The Gentleman's Calling_,
and _The Ladies' Calling_, with some degree of certainty to Richard
Allestree,[420] one of the learned and devout men who found in Lady
Pakington intellectual as well as religious sympathy. But it seems
quite probable that Lady Pakington assisted him in _The Ladies'
Calling_. At any rate, whoever the author, the book may fairly be
considered an expression of the ideals of the group surrounding Lady
Pakington, an outgrowth of their discussions. The "Calling" described
is purely religious in tone, and the republication of the book in
1673 gains an added significance when we think of it as a protest
against the social customs of the Restoration court and an appeal
to ladies of high rank, summoning them to a sober sense of their
duties and responsibilities. In an exaltation of Meekness, Modesty,
Affability, and Piety as the genuine and proper Ornaments of Women,
the author states the opposing faults as he has observed them. The
picture he gives of ladies in the best circles is sufficiently
appalling. Under "Modesty" is a protest against "Female swearers."
"An Oath sounds gratingly out of whatever mouth, but out of a woman's
it hath such an uncooth harshness that there is no noise this side
of Hell can be more amazingly odious." Drinking is also reprobated
as "a vice detestable in all, but prodigious in women," "nothing
human being so much a beast as a drunken woman." Modesty also forbids
excessive talkativeness, "that indecency of loquacity" generally
charged to women. It forbids loudness of discourse, "a blustering or
ranting style," or even "unhandsome earnestness." All mannishness
in speech, manner, or dress must be avoided. Public speaking, even
on the part of gifted women, is alien alike to St. Paul and true
modesty. "Incontinence of mind," whereby secrets slip so easily
from the female grasp, is likewise opposed to the sobriety and
self-restraint implied in modesty.
Attractive and important as modesty is, it is outranked in value as a
daily necessity by Meekness, meekness of the will, of the affections,
of the understanding. Women particularly need this endearing quality
of ready submission to authority, for, "since God has thus determined
subjection to be the women's lot, there needs no other argument of
its fitness, or for their acquiescence"; and since they must always
be under the control of parents or husband, they will do well to
cultivate meekness, "the parent of peace."
Affability and compassion are considered natural to women. They also
have a predisposition to Piety, for it is based on Fear and Love,
the "two most pungent passions of the female sex," and is, besides,
their greatest ornament. Devotion, since it "requires a supple gentle
soil," finds feminine softness and pliability very apt and proper for
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account