The Learned Lady in England, 1650-1760Reynolds, Myra
History
The Learned Lady in England, 1650-1760
Reynolds, Myra
Women -- Education -- Great Britain; Women -- Great Britain; Women authors, English
Pretend not in Company to Wit; you will certainly betray your
Judgment. Women seldom appear more foolish, than when they aspire
to the Glory of being thought wise. Good God! How was I plague'd
t'other Day with the Impertinence of Madam H. She commented
upon _Aristotle_, and Lectur'd us upon the _Summe_ of _Thomas
Aquinas_. She scorn'd the Female Topick of Modes and Dresses, and
was for dancing on the high Ropes of _Physicks_ and _Divinity_.
We were first regaled with _Materia Prima_; then came up a Dish
of _Occult Qualities_; and at last a whole Plate of Theological
Terms were flung among the Company. It was as impossible to stop
her in this learned Career, as a Ship under full Sail, and you
might have sooner silenc'd a Hurricane, than have fetter'd her
Ladyship's Tongue. The Sex admir'd her Wisdom, and the Men smil'd
at her Folly. She is [_sic_] made a Provision of School Jargon,
and laid it out with much Prodigality, and more Assurance. But
all her Knowledge stuck on the Superficies of Words, she enter'd
not into the Sense. So that the Fame of her Parts shrunk under
Experience, and this Phœnix of women prov'd only a well-taught
Parrot.[433]
To a eulogy of needlework he adds:
You may season Works with Reading, for though Women should not
pretend to commence Doctors, yet I would not have 'em forswear
Knowledge, nor make a Vow of Stupidity. Indeed it's not necessary
to Rival the Knowledge of the Sybils, nor the Science of the
Muses, she should not wade too deep into Controversy, nor
soar so high as Divinity. These Studies lie out of a Lady's
Way: They fly up to the Head, and not only intoxicate weak
Brains, but turn them; They engender Pride, and blow us up with
Self-conceitedness, and when all these meet, we shall be apt to
measure Faith by our private Judgment, and set up our ill-shap'd
Notions against the receiv'd Tenets of our Religion.[434]
Eusebius joins with nearly all contemporary moralists in a
condemnation of romances:
Let not Romances come within reach of a young Lady: They are
the Poison of Youth and murther Souls, as sure as Arsenick or
Rats-bane kills Bodies.... Alas, when a young Creature reads
over flourish'd Descriptions of conquering Beauties, and captive
Knights; what a fine Landskip will they draw in her Head? How
powerfully will they work upon her tender Heart? What a Tumult
will they raise in her Breast?... How often will they envy a
Philoclea for having a _Pyrocles_ at her Feet, and how seriously
will she wish herself in the Place of Pamelia. Nay, it's odd,
when the Fancy is warm'd, and the Imagination charm'd with the
advantageous Characters of those Platonick Knights, she may fall
in Love with the bare Product of _Sidney's_ Brain, and become a
real Slave to Fable and Fiction.[435]
So convincing was Eusebius that Emilia said on leaving:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account